ArticlePloS one2024
Effects of team-based mixed reality simulation program in emergency situations.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Holopatient technology in nursing education: a cross-sectional analysis of student and faculty perceptions.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Application of head-mounted display-based augmented and mixed reality in nursing education: a scoping review.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- A scoping review of the applications of augmented reality in nursing.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of extended reality technologies in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a bayesian network meta-analysis.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Effective strategies for cultivating rapid response, team collaboration, and stress resistance in emergency standardized training nurses during real rescue.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of a team-based mixed reality simulation program about emergencies.
methodA nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design was utilized. We recruited 32 nurses for the experimental group and 32 for the control group, resulting in a total of 61 nurses ultimately included as subjects for analysis. This mixed reality program is designed to facilitate responses in cardiopulmonary resuscitation situations simultaneously using four HoloLens. With shared content visible to all four trainees, the participants could engage in simulation while freely communicating. The experimental group engaged in cardiopulmonary resuscitation emergency simulation while wearing the HoloLens, while the control group was provided with written CPR materials.
resultsThere were significant increases in the experimental group's critical thinking (p < .001), learning transfer motivation (p = .006), communication confidence (p = .033), and learning immersion (p < .001) compared to the control group.
conclusionThe program developed in this study presents an effective educational strategy that can enhance nurses' emergency competencies and leverage the practicality of mixed reality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.