Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38422015›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Boardgames as an innovative approach to promote life skills and well-being among inmates: A scoping review protocol.

Carlo Andrea Pensavalle, Maria Giuliana Solinas, Christian Gardoni, Gabriele Giorgi, Tiziano Antognozzi, Federico Alessio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlo Andrea PensavalleDepartment of Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sardinia, Italy.
Maria Giuliana SolinasDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2174-0983
Christian GardoniDepartment of Primary Education, European University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gabriele GiorgiDepartment of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Tiziano AntognozziAXES-Laboratory for the Analysis of Complex Economic Systems, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy.
Federico AlessioBusiness@Health Laboratory, European University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past few decades, a growing body of evidence has emerged regarding the positive impact of boardgames in promoting life skills and well-being in various settings including health, education, and military schooling. However, the use of boardgames with inmates for cultural and educational purposes is still an unexplored and fragmented area of research. Incorporating boardgames into correctional settings can be a complex challenge for correctional stakeholders who seek to identify innovative tools to enhance inmate education and promote integration into society after incarceration. This article outlines our scoping review protocol designed to map and evaluate published and grey literature on the motivational, psychological, and pedagogical considerations involved in the design and use of boardgames as an innovative approach to promoting life skills and well-being among inmates.

Indexed as

PrisonersEducational StatusHumansMotivationScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID38422015
PMCPMC10903794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.