ArticlePloS one2024
Machine learning approaches to enhance diagnosis and staging of patients with MASLD using routinely available clinical information.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07731360 (A Non-Invasive Diagnostic Panel for MASLD in Children With Obesity), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Non-Invasive Diagnostic Panel for MASLD in Children With Obesity: Evaluation of a Multiparametric Biomarker Panel and Genetic Risk Score Using LASSO-Regularized Logistic Regression - The PedMASLD-MultiOmics Pilot Study
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discovery of Epidermal Growth Factor-Like 7 as a Potential Non-Invasive Biomarker for Fibrosis and Mortality Risk in MASLD.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Context-dependent modulation of the TAK1-MAPK axis by ginsenoside-based formulations along the NAFLD-HCC continuum.Journal of ginseng research · 2026Article
- An Explainable AI Tool (FibroX) for Detecting Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Pilot Crossover Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Article
- Prediction of trajectories and outcomes in early-stage metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a narrative review.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Global trends, epidemiological patterns, and disability burden of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease-related cirrhosis from 1990 to 2021: A comprehensive analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Risk Assessment and Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Noncirrhotic Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Real-world evidence in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): insights, challenges, and future directions.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- Development and evaluation of machine learning models for predicting significant liver fibrosis stages: A retrospective analysis.Canadian liver journal · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Implications in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A State-of-the-Art Review.Korean circulation journal · 2026Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Smart Devices in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: Transforming diagnosis and therapeutic approaches.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Incorporating Insulin Resistance Biomarkers into Machine Learning Models Enhances Diagnostic Accuracy for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Association between UMAP-identified body composition phenotypes and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in the general population of China.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based identification of targeted metabolomic biomarkers for early diagnosis and fibrosis-stage discrimination in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- Development of a Neural Network to Detect Hepatic Steatosis in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Early Detection of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Using Non-Invasive Routine Clinical and Laboratory Data.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Integrated Patient Digital and Biomimetic Twins for Precision Medicine: A Perspective.Seminars in liver disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 17 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsMetabolic dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) outcomes such as MASH (metabolic dysfunction associated steatohepatitis), fibrosis and cirrhosis are ordinarily determined by resource-intensive and invasive biopsies. We aim to show that routine clinical tests offer sufficient information to predict these endpoints.
methodsUsing the LITMUS Metacohort derived from the European NAFLD Registry, the largest MASLD dataset in Europe, we create three combinations of features which vary in degree of procurement including a 19-variable feature set that are attained through a routine clinical appointment or blood test. This data was used to train predictive models using supervised machine learning (ML) algorithm XGBoost, alongside missing imputation technique MICE and class balancing algorithm SMOTE. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were added to determine relative importance for each clinical variable.
resultsAnalysing nine biopsy-derived MASLD outcomes of cohort size ranging between 5385 and 6673 subjects, we were able to predict individuals at training set AUCs ranging from 0.719-0.994, including classifying individuals who are At-Risk MASH at an AUC = 0.899. Using two further feature combinations of 26-variables and 35-variables, which included composite scores known to be good indicators for MASLD endpoints and advanced specialist tests, we found predictive performance did not sufficiently improve. We are also able to present local and global explanations for each ML model, offering clinicians interpretability without the expense of worsening predictive performance.
conclusionsThis study developed a series of ML models of accuracy ranging from 71.9-99.4% using only easily extractable and readily available information in predicting MASLD outcomes which are usually determined through highly invasive means.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.