Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38421967›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Illness presenteeism among physicians and trainees: Study protocol of a scoping review.

Lorenzo Madrazo, Jade Choo-Foo, Marie-Cécile Domecq, Kori A LaDonna, Susan Humphrey-Murto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorenzo MadrazoDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0177-7220
Jade Choo-FooDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Marie-Cécile DomecqFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kori A LaDonnaDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Susan Humphrey-MurtoDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIllness presenteeism (IP) is the phenomenon where individuals continue to work despite illness. While it has been a prevalent and longstanding issue in medicine, the recent onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the growing movement to improve physician wellness brings renewed interest in this topic. However, there have been no comprehensive reviews on the state of literature of this topic. PURPOSE: The main aim of this scoping review is to explore what is known about presenteeism in physicians, residents, and medical students in order to map and summarize the literature, identify research gaps and inform future research. More specifically: How has illness presenteeism been defined, problematized or perceived? What methods and approaches have been used to study the phenomenon? Has the literature changed since the pandemic?

methodUsing the Arksey and O'Malley framework several databases will be searched by an experienced librarian. Through an iterative process, inclusion and exclusion criteria will be developed and a data extraction form refined. Data will be analyzed using quantitative and qualitative content analyses. POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS OF

resultsBy summarizing the literature on IP, this study will provide a better understanding of the IP phenomena to inform future research and potentially have implications for physician wellness and public health.

Indexed as

PhysiciansPresenteeismCOVID-19HumansPandemicsPublic HealthScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID38421967
PMCPMC10903841
OpenAlexW4392283878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.