Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38421960›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Development of an intervention for reducing infant bathing frequency.

Lucy P Goldsmith, Michael R Perkin, Charlotte Wahlich, Lakshmi Chandrasekaran, Victoria Cornelius, Robert J Boyle, Carsten Flohr, Amanda Roberts, Kathryn Willis, Michael Ussher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lucy P GoldsmithPopulation Health Research Institute, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6934-1925
Michael R PerkinPopulation Health Research Institute, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Charlotte WahlichPopulation Health Research Institute, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Lakshmi ChandrasekaranPopulation Health Research Institute, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Victoria CorneliusImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0080-1065
Robert J BoyleNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Carsten FlohrUnit for Paediatric and Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amanda RobertsNottingham Support Group for Carers of Children with Eczema, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-3695
Kathryn WillisPopulation Health Research Institute, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Michael UssherPopulation Health Research Institute, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0995-7955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBathing babies less frequently and intensively in the first six months of life may prevent eczema, but this has not yet been definitively tested in a randomised controlled trial. Such a trial would require evidence-based support to help parents engage with a minimal bathing routine. The present study reports the development of this support.

methodsWe adopted a four-stage design process: (i) Pregnant women and their families (n = 31) were interviewed to ascertain key barriers and facilitators towards following the minimal bathing intervention. (ii) These barriers and facilitators were mapped to behaviour change techniques, focussing on the intervention types of education, persuasion and environmental restructuring, alongside appropriate modes of delivery, and prototype intervention materials were developed. (iii) We iteratively refined these materials in a workshop with multidisciplinary experts and Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) representatives (n = 13) and an (iv) intervention walkthrough with families (n = 5). The design process was informed by the Behaviour Change Wheel, Theoretical framework of acceptability and the Template for intervention description and replication.

resultsSocial influences and motivational factors are likely to influence both uptake and adherence to the intervention. Anticipated emotional reward from participating in research for the benefit of others was indicated to be a strong facilitator for intervention uptake. Alternatives to bathing, having fun with the baby and the night-time routine, alongside family support, were notable facilitators suggested to aid adherence to the intervention. Barriers included hygiene concerns and anticipated negative social appraisal. Barriers and facilitators were mapped to thirty-six behaviour change techniques, focussing on the intervention types of education, persuasion and environmental restructuring, all of which were embedded into the package of support. The prototype intervention materials received positive feedback from the expert workshop and study walkthrough with families. The final package of support comprises printed and digital prompts and cues, a study booklet, video, and digital tool for self-monitoring.

conclusionsThe intervention design process incorporated the 'real world' views and experiences of families, experts and PPIE representatives, alongside criteria for designing behavioural interventions. The effectiveness of the package of support will be tested in a feasibility trial and embedded process evaluation.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyEczemaCuesFemaleHumansInfantPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38421960
PMCPMC10903808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.