Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38421662›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2024

ATXN7-Related Cone-Rod Dystrophy: The Integrated Functional Evaluation of the Cerebellum (CERMOI) Study.

Marco Nassisi, Giulia Coarelli, Benoit Blanchard, Charlotte Dubec-Fleury, Karima Drine, Nicolas Kitic, Serge Sancho, Rania Hilab, Sophie Tezenas du Montcel, Candice Junge and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04288128 (Integrated Functional Evaluation of the Cerebellum), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04288128 completednot on this map

Integrated Functional Evaluation of the Cerebellum

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceRan2020 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsSpinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2, Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7ArmsLumbar puncture, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco NassisiSorbonne Université, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Giulia CoarelliSorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris, France.
Benoit BlanchardCentre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, National Rare Disease Center REFERET and Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale Directorate General of Health Care Provision, Centres d'Investigations Cliniques 1423, Paris, France.
Charlotte Dubec-FleurySorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris, France.
Karima DrineCentre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, National Rare Disease Center REFERET and Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale Directorate General of Health Care Provision, Centres d'Investigations Cliniques 1423, Paris, France.
Nicolas KiticCentre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, National Rare Disease Center REFERET and Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale Directorate General of Health Care Provision, Centres d'Investigations Cliniques 1423, Paris, France.
Serge SanchoCentre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, National Rare Disease Center REFERET and Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale Directorate General of Health Care Provision, Centres d'Investigations Cliniques 1423, Paris, France.
Rania HilabSorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris, France.
Sophie Tezenas du MontcelSorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris, France.
Candice JungeIonis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California.
Roger LaneIonis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California.
H Moore ArnoldBiogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Alexandra DurrSorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris, France.
Isabelle AudoSorbonne Université, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Centre hospitalier national d'ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts · FRInstitut du Cerveau · FRIonis Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRBiogen (United States) · USPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Reliable biomarkers with diagnostic and prognostic values are needed for upcoming gene therapy trials for spinocerebellar ataxias. Objective: To identify ophthalmological biomarkers in a sample of spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7) carriers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This article presents baseline data from a cross-sectional natural history study conducted in Paris, France, reference centers for rare diseases from May 2020 to April 2021. Data were analyzed from September to December 2022. Fifteen adult ATXN7 pathogenic expansion carriers (9 with preataxia and 6 with ataxia) were included, all with a Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) score of 15 of 40 or lower. Patients were recruited at the Paris Brain Institute, and all contacted patients accepted to participate in the study. Main Outcomes and Measures: Three visits (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months) were planned, including neurological examination (SARA and Composite Cerebellar Functional Severity Score), ophthalmological examination (best-corrected visual acuity, microperimetry, full-field electroretinogram, optical coherence tomography, and fundus autofluorescence imaging), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) measurements. Here we report the baseline ophthalmic data from the cohort and determine whether there is a correlation between disease scores and ophthalmic results. Results: Among the 15 included SCA7 carriers (median [range] age, 38 [18-60] years; 8 women and 7 men), 12 displayed cone or cone-rod dystrophy, with the number of CAG repeats correlating with disease severity (ρ, 0.73, 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.90; P < .001). Two patients with cone-rod dystrophy exhibited higher repeat numbers and greater ataxia scores (median [range] SARA score, 9 [7-15]) compared to those with only cone dystrophy (median [range] SARA score, 2 [0-5]). A correlation emerged for outer nuclear layer thickness with SARA score (ρ, -0.88; 95% CI, -0.96 to -0.59; P < .001) and NfL levels (ρ, -0.87; 95% CI, -0.86 to 0.96; P < .001). Moreover, ataxia severity was correlated with visual acuity (ρ: 0.89; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.96; P < .001) and retinal sensitivity (ρ, -0.88; 95% CI, -0.96 to 0.59; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, retinal abnormalities were found at preataxic stages of the disease. Most of the carriers presented with cone dystrophy and preserved rod function. The outer nuclear layer thickness correlated with SARA score and plasma NfL levels suggesting nuclear layer thickness to be a biomarker of disease severity. These findings contribute to understanding the dynamics of SCA7-related retinal dystrophy and may help lay the groundwork for future therapeutic intervention monitoring and clinical trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04288128.

Indexed as

Cone DystrophyCone-Rod DystrophiesSpinocerebellar AtaxiasAdultBiomarkersCerebellumCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID38421662
PMCPMC10905377
OpenAlexW4394768575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.