Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38421640›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024

Optimized protocols for RNA interference in Macrostomum lignano.

Stijn Mouton, Alexandra Mougel, Kirill Ustyantsev, Colette Dissous, Oleg Melnyk, Eugene Berezikov, Jérôme Vicogne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stijn MoutonEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen 9700AD, The Netherlands.
Alexandra MougelUniv. Lille, CNRS, INSERM, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR9017-CIIL-Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France.
Kirill UstyantsevEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen 9700AD, The Netherlands.
Colette DissousUniv. Lille, CNRS, INSERM, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR9017-CIIL-Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France.
Oleg MelnykUniv. Lille, CNRS, INSERM, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR9017-CIIL-Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France.
Eugene BerezikovEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen 9700AD, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1145-2884
Jérôme VicogneUniv. Lille, CNRS, INSERM, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR9017-CIIL-Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8360-7497
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

Dutch Research Council OCENW.KLEIN.054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrostomum lignano, a marine free-living flatworm, has emerged as a potent invertebrate model in developmental biology for studying stem cells, germline, and regeneration processes. In recent years, many tools have been developed to manipulate this worm and to facilitate genetic modification. RNA interference is currently the most accessible and direct technique to investigate gene functions. It is obtained by soaking worms in artificial seawater containing dsRNA targeting the gene of interest. Although easy to perform, the original protocol calls for daily exchange of dsRNA solutions, usually until phenotypes are observed, which is both time- and cost-consuming. In this work, we have evaluated alternative dsRNA delivery techniques, such as electroporation and osmotic shock, to facilitate the experiments with improved time and cost efficiency. During our investigation to optimize RNAi, we demonstrated that, in the absence of diatoms, regular single soaking in artificial seawater containing dsRNA directly produced in bacteria or synthesized in vitro is, in most cases, sufficient to induce a potent gene knockdown for several days with a single soaking step. Therefore, this new and highly simplified method allows a very significant reduction of dsRNA consumption and lab work. In addition, it enables performing experiments on a larger number of worms at minimal cost.

Indexed as

PlatyhelminthsRNA, Double-StrandedRNA InterferenceAnimalsElectroporationGene Knockdown TechniquesRNA, Double-StrandedelectroporationgermlineMacrostomum lignanoregenerationRNA interferencesoaking

Identifiers

PMID38421640
PMCPMC11075559
OpenAlexW4392284427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.