ArticleAdvances in therapy2024
Identification of a Group of Therapeutic Targets and Prognostic Biomarker for Triple Negative Breast Cancer.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease. Mining differentially expressed genes of TNBC is helpful to explore new therapeutic targets. This study aimed to investigate diagnostic biomarker genes in TNBC compared to normal tissue. Additionally, we explored the functions and prognostic value of these key genes as well as potential targeted drugs that could affect these genes.
methodsDifferential gene expression analysis was conducted using the R software with data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Then, the identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were used to construct a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) database and Cytoscape software. The mRNA expression levels of key genes were analyzed using the UALCAN database with data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Enrichment and survival analyses were performed using R software. In addition, potential compounds showing sensitivity to key genes were identified by gene set cancer analysis (GSCA).
resultsCompared with normal tissues, a total of 203 DEGs were upregulated in TNBC. These DEGs participated in various biological processes including nuclear division, microtubule binding, cell cycle, and the p53 signaling pathway. Through the PPI network analysis, ten key genes were identified, among which four genes showed significant correlation with poor progression-free interval (PFI) in patients with TNBC. Moreover, the four survival-related genes were found to act as sensitive therapeutic targets.
conclusionThe identified four key genes were considered new biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis and also potential therapeutic targets for TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.