Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38421499›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

Cancer-related pain in head and neck cancer survivors: longitudinal findings from the Head and Neck 5000 clinical cohort.

Iakov Bolnykh, Joanne M Patterson, Sam Harding, Laura-Jayne Watson, Liya Lu, Katrina Hurley, Steve J Thomas, Linda Sharp

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. A scoping review of pain and tobacco use among cancer survivors.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Iakov BolnykhPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle, UK.
Joanne M PattersonLiverpool Head and Neck Centre, School of Health Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sam HardingSpeech and Language Therapy Research Unit, Southmead Hospital North Bristol NHS Hospital Trust, Bristol, UK.
Laura-Jayne WatsonSpeech & Language Therapy, Sunderland Royal Hospital, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK.
Liya LuPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle, UK.
Katrina HurleyHead & Neck 5000 Study, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Steve J ThomasHead & Neck 5000 Study, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Linda SharpPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle, UK. linda.sharp@newcastle.ac.uk.
Newcastle University · GBNHS Forth Valley · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBSunderland Royal Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C18281/A19169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReports suggest pain is common in head and neck cancer (HNC). However, past studies are limited by small sample sizes and design and measurement heterogeneity. Using data from the Head and Neck 5000 longitudinal cohort, we investigated pain over a year post-diagnosis. We assessed: temporal trends; compared pain across HNC treatments, stages, sites and by HPV status; and identified subgroups of patients at increased risk of pain.

methodsSociodemographic and clinical data and patient-reported pain (measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35) were collected at baseline (pre-treatment), 4- and 12- months. Using mixed effects multivariable regression, we investigated time trends and identified associations between (i) clinically-important general pain and (ii) HN-specific pain and clinical, socio-economic, and demographic variables.

results2,870 patients were included. At baseline, 40.9% had clinically-important general pain, rising to 47.6% at 4-months and declining to 35.5% at 12-months. HN-specific pain followed a similar pattern (mean score (sd): baseline 26.4 (25.10); 4-months. 28.9 (26.55); 12-months, 17.2 (19.83)). Across time, general and HN-specific pain levels were increased in: younger patients, smokers, and those with depression and comorbidities at baseline, and more advanced, oral cavity and HPV negative cancers.

conclusionsThere is high prevalence of general pain in people living with HNC. We identified subgroups more often reporting general and HN-specific pain towards whom interventions could be targeted. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Greater emphasis should be placed on identifying and treating pain in HNC. Systematic pain screening could help identify those who could benefit from an early pain management plan.

Indexed as

Cancer PainCancer SurvivorsHead and Neck NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeHN5000HNCPainSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID38421499
PMCPMC12283790
OpenAlexW4392292928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.