Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38421234›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2024

Knowledge and attitudes on implementing cardiovascular pharmacogenomic testing.

Callan Russell, MaryAnn Campion, Megan E Grove, Kelly Matsuda, Teri E Klein, Euan Ashley, Hetanshi Naik, Matthew T Wheeler, Stuart A Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Callan RussellDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-6827-9599
MaryAnn CampionDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8627-7048
Megan E GroveClinical Genomics Laboratory, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7972-0005
Kelly MatsudaDivision of Pharmacy and Cardiology, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Teri E KleinDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5527-6475
Euan AshleyStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9418-9577
Hetanshi NaikDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5894-7390
Matthew T WheelerStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8721-3022
Stuart A ScottClinical Genomics Laboratory, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5720-1864

Funding

PharmGKB: pharmacogenomics discovery and implementationU24HG010615 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI TERI Ellen KLEIN, Michelle Whirl-Carrillo · 2020 to 2026
$9.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG010615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics has the potential to inform drug dosing and selection, reduce adverse events, and improve medication efficacy; however, provider knowledge of pharmacogenomic testing varies across provider types and specialties. Given that many actionable pharmacogenomic genes are implicated in cardiovascular medication response variability, this study aimed to evaluate cardiology providers' knowledge and attitudes on implementing clinical pharmacogenomic testing. Sixty-one providers responded to an online survey, including pharmacists (46%), physicians (31%), genetic counselors (15%), and nurses (8%). Most respondents (94%) reported previous genetics education; however, only 52% felt their genetics education prepared them to order a clinical pharmacogenomic test. In addition, most respondents (66%) were familiar with pharmacogenomics, with genetic counselors being most likely to be familiar (p < 0.001). Only 15% of respondents had previously ordered a clinical pharmacogenomic test and a total of 36% indicated they are likely to order a pharmacogenomic test in the future; however, the vast majority of respondents (89%) were interested in pharmacogenomic testing being incorporated into diagnostic cardiovascular genetic tests. Moreover, 84% of providers preferred pharmacogenomic panel testing compared to 16% who preferred single gene testing. Half of the providers reported being comfortable discussing pharmacogenomic results with their patients, but the majority (60%) expressed discomfort with the logistics of test ordering. Reported barriers to implementation included uncertainty about the clinical utility and difficulty choosing an appropriate test. Taken together, cardiology providers have moderate familiarity with pharmacogenomics and limited experience with test ordering; however, they are interested in incorporating pharmacogenomics into diagnostic genetic tests and ordering pharmacogenomic panels.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular SystemPharmacogenomic TestingGenetic TestingHumansPharmacistsPharmacogenetics

Identifiers

PMID38421234
PMCPMC10903329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.