Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38421146›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2024

MAST: Phylogenetic Inference with Mixtures Across Sites and Trees.

Thomas K F Wong, Caitlin Cherryh, Allen G Rodrigo, Matthew W Hahn, Bui Quang Minh, Robert Lanfear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetics and genomics of hybridization.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Toward a genomic understanding of the tree of life.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Recombination and phylogenetic inference.Evolutionary journal of the Linnean Society · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas K F WongSchool of Computing, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0580-6324
Caitlin CherryhResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Allen G RodrigoSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Matthew W HahnDepartment of Biology and Department of Computer Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
Bui Quang MinhSchool of Computing, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5535-6560
Robert LanfearResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council Discovery Project DP200103151Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative GrantMoore-Simons FoundationNational Science Foundation DEB-1936187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hundreds or thousands of loci are now routinely used in modern phylogenomic studies. Concatenation approaches to tree inference assume that there is a single topology for the entire dataset, but different loci may have different evolutionary histories due to incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), introgression, and/or horizontal gene transfer; even single loci may not be treelike due to recombination. To overcome this shortcoming, we introduce an implementation of a multi-tree mixture model that we call mixtures across sites and trees (MAST). This model extends a prior implementation by Boussau et al. (2009) by allowing users to estimate the weight of each of a set of pre-specified bifurcating trees in a single alignment. The MAST model allows each tree to have its own weight, topology, branch lengths, substitution model, nucleotide or amino acid frequencies, and model of rate heterogeneity across sites. We implemented the MAST model in a maximum-likelihood framework in the popular phylogenetic software, IQ-TREE. Simulations show that we can accurately recover the true model parameters, including branch lengths and tree weights for a given set of tree topologies, under a wide range of biologically realistic scenarios. We also show that we can use standard statistical inference approaches to reject a single-tree model when data are simulated under multiple trees (and vice versa). We applied the MAST model to multiple primate datasets and found that it can recover the signal of ILS in the Great Apes, as well as the asymmetry in minor trees caused by introgression among several macaque species. When applied to a dataset of 4 Platyrrhine species for which standard concatenated maximum likelihood (ML) and gene tree approaches disagree, we observe that MAST gives the highest weight (i.e., the largest proportion of sites) to the tree also supported by gene tree approaches. These results suggest that the MAST model is able to analyze a concatenated alignment using ML while avoiding some of the biases that come with assuming there is only a single tree. We discuss how the MAST model can be extended in the future.

Indexed as

ClassificationPhylogenyAnimalsComputer SimulationModels, GeneticSoftwareIncomplete lineage sortingintrogressionmixture modelmultitree modelphylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID38421146
PMCPMC11282360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.