Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38421007›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2024

Use of selective gut decontamination in critically ill children: PICnIC a pilot RCT and mixed-methods study.

Alanna Brown, Paloma Ferrando-Vivas, Mariana Popa, Gema Milla de la Fuente, John Pappachan, Brian H Cuthbertson, Laura Drikite, Richard Feltbower, Theodore Gouliouris, Isobel Sale and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Update on infection prevention in the ICU.Current opinion in critical care · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Alanna BrownClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0104-3251
Paloma Ferrando-VivasClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2163-645X
Mariana PopaDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-9237-4094
Gema Milla de la FuenteClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2134-3462
John PappachanPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Southampton Children's Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3559-0595
Brian H CuthbertsonDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4174-9424
Laura DrikiteClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5194-4189
Richard FeltbowerPICANet, Division of Epidemiology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1728-9408
Theodore GouliourisClinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2011-1205
Isobel SalePPI representative, UK.
Robert ShulmanDepartment of Pharmacy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lyvonne N TumeIntensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2547-8209
John MyburghGeorge Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4088-7016
Kerry WoolfallDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5726-5304
David A HarrisonClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9002-9098
Paul R MounceyClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8510-8517
Kathryn RowanClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8217-5602
Nazima PathanDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7656-9453
Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouthampton Children's Hospital · GBSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare-associated infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill children. In adults, data suggest the use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract may reduce the incidence of healthcare-associated infections. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract has not been evaluated in the paediatric intensive care unit population. Objectives: To determine the feasibility of conducting a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial in critically ill children comparing selective decontamination of the digestive tract with standard infection control. Design: Parallel-group pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial with an integrated mixed-methods study. Setting: Six paediatric intensive care units in England. Participants: Children (> 37 weeks corrected gestational age, up to 16 years) requiring mechanical ventilation expected to last for at least 48 hours were eligible for the PICnIC pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial. During the ecology periods, all children admitted to the paediatric intensive care units were eligible. Parents/legal guardians of recruited patients and healthcare professionals working in paediatric intensive care units were eligible for inclusion in the mixed-methods study. Interventions: The interventions in the PICnIC pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial included administration of selective decontamination of the digestive tract as oro-pharyngeal paste and as a suspension given by enteric tube during the period of mechanical ventilation. Main outcome measures: The decision as to whether a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial is feasible is based on multiple outcomes, including (but not limited to): (1) willingness and ability to recruit eligible patients; (2) adherence to the selective decontamination of the digestive tract intervention; (3) acceptability of the definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial; (4) estimation of recruitment rate; and (5) understanding of potential clinical and ecological outcome measures. Results: A total of 368 children (85% of all those who were eligible) were enrolled in the PICnIC pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial across six paediatric intensive care units: 207 in the baseline phase (Period One) and 161 in the intervention period (Period Two). In sites delivering selective decontamination of the digestive tract, the majority (98%) of children received at least one dose of selective decontamination of the digestive tract, and of these, 68% commenced within the first 6 hours. Consent for the collection of additional swabs was low (44%), though data completeness for potential outcomes, including microbiology data from routine clinical swab testing, was excellent. Recruited children were representative of the wider paediatric intensive care unit population. Overall, 3.6 children/site/week were recruited compared with the potential recruitment rate for a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial of 3 children/site/week, based on data from all UK paediatric intensive care units. The proposed trial, including consent and selective decontamination of the digestive tract, was acceptable to parents and staff with adaptations, including training to improve consent and communication, and adaptations to the administration protocol for the paste and ecology monitoring. Clinical outcomes that were considered important included duration of organ failure and hospital stay, healthcare-acquired infections and survival. Limitations: The delivery of the pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to slow set-up of sites, and a lack of face-to face training. Conclusions: PICnIC's findings indicate that a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial in selective decontamination of the digestive tract in paediatric intensive care units is feasible with the inclusion modifications, which would need to be included in a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial to ensure that the efficiency of trial processes is maximised. Future work: A definitive trial that incorporates the protocol adaptations and outcomes arising from this study is feasible and should be conducted. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN40310490. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 16/152/01) and is published in full in

Indexed as

Cross InfectionDecontaminationAdultChildCritical IllnessEnglandHumansPandemicsANTIMICROBIALRESISTANCEANTIMICROBIAL THERAPYHEALTHCARE ACQUIRED INFECTIONINFECTION CONTROLSDDSELECTIVE DIGESTIVE DECONTAMINATION

Identifiers

PMID38421007
PMCPMC11017160
OpenAlexW4392304622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.