Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38420907›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2024

Introduction to target trial emulation in rehabilitation: a systematic approach to emulate a randomized controlled trial using observational data.

Pierre Côté, Stefano Negrini, Sabrina Donzelli, Carlotte Kiekens, Chiara Arienti, Maria G Ceravolo, Douglas P Gross, Irene Battel, Giorgio Ferriero, Stefano G Lazzarini and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The use of botulinum toxin for spasticity in people with spinal cord injury: a scoping review.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pierre CôtéInstitute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
Stefano NegriniDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dentals Sciences, University "La Statale", Milan, Italy.
Sabrina DonzelliDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Carlotte KiekensIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Chiara ArientiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Maria G CeravoloDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche University, Ancona, Italy.
Douglas P GrossDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Irene BattelDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dentals Sciences, University "La Statale", Milan, Italy - irene.battel@gmail.com.
Giorgio FerrieroDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Stefano G LazzariniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Bernard DanFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Heather M ShearerInstitute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
Jessica J WongInstitute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
Participants in the 5th Cochrane Rehabilitation Methodological Meeting

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rehabilitation providers and policymakers need valid evidence to make informed decisions about the healthcare needs of the population. Whenever possible, these decisions should be informed by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, there are circumstances when evidence needs to be generated rapidly, or when RCTs are not ethical or feasible. These situations apply to studying the effects of complex interventions, including rehabilitation as defined by Cochrane Rehabilitation. Therefore, we explore using the target trial emulation framework by Hernán and colleagues to obtain valid estimates of the causal effects of rehabilitation when RCTs cannot be conducted. Target trial emulation is a framework guiding the design and analysis of non-randomized comparative effectiveness studies using observational data, by emulating a hypothetical RCT. In the context of rehabilitation, we outline steps for applying the target trial emulation framework using real world data, highlighting methodological considerations, limitations, potential mitigating strategies, and causal inference and counterfactual theory as foundational principles to estimating causal effects. Overall, we aim to strengthen methodological approaches used to estimate causal effects of rehabilitation when RCTs cannot be conducted.

Indexed as

Comparative Effectiveness ResearchRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRehabilitationHumans

Identifiers

PMID38420907
PMCPMC10938938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.