Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38420649›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2024

Characterization of Acellular Cartilage Matrix-Sodium Alginate Scaffolds in Various Proportions.

Wang Lu, Mengchu Yang, Yanan Zhang, Baoxi Meng, Fulian Ma, Wanjun Wang, Teng Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wang LuDepartment of Plastic Surgery and The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Mengchu YangDepartment of Plastic Surgery and The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yanan ZhangDepartment of Plastic Surgery and The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Baoxi MengDepartment of Plastic Surgery and The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Fulian MaDepartment of Plastic Surgery and The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Wanjun WangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Teng GuoDepartment of Plastic Surgery and The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology has provided a new solution to address the shortage of donors, multiple surgeries, and aesthetic concerns in microtia reconstruction surgery. The production of bioinks is the most critical aspect of 3D bioprinting. Acellular cartilage matrix (ACM) and sodium alginate (SA) are commonly used 3D bioprinting materials, and there have been reports of their combined use. However, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluations on ACM-SA scaffolds with different proportions. In this study, bioinks were prepared by mixing different proportions of decellularized rabbit ear cartilage powder and SA and then printed using 3D bioprinting technology and crosslinked with calcium ions to fabricate scaffolds. The physical properties, biocompatibility, and toxicity of ACM-SA scaffolds with different proportions were compared. The adhesion and proliferation of rabbit adipose-derived stem cells on ACM-SA scaffolds of different proportions, as well as the secretion of Collagen Type II, were evaluated under an adipose-derived stem cell chondrogenic induction medium. The following conclusions were drawn: when the proportion of SA in the ACM-SA scaffolds was <30%, the printed structure failed to form. The ACM-SA scaffolds in proportions from 1:9 to 6:4 showed no significant cytotoxicity, among which the 5:5 proportion of ACM-SA scaffold was superior in terms of adhesiveness and promoting cell proliferation and differentiation. Although a higher proportion of SA can provide greater mechanical strength, it also significantly increases the swelling ratio and reduces cell proliferation capabilities. Overall, the 5:5 proportion of ACM-SA scaffold demonstrated a more desirable biological and physical performance.

Indexed as

BioprintingTissue EngineeringAlginatesAnimalsCell DifferentiationEar CartilagePrinting, Three-DimensionalRabbitsTissue ScaffoldsAlginates3D bioprintingacellular cartilage matrixadipose-derived stem cellrabbitscaffoldssodium alginate

Identifiers

PMID38420649
PMCPMC11001505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.