Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38420596›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2024

Using generative artificial intelligence in bibliometric analysis: 10 years of research trends from the European Resuscitation Congresses.

Nino Fijačko, Ruth Masterson Creber, Benjamin S Abella, Primož Kocbek, Špela Metličar, Robert Greif, Gregor Štiglic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The transformative impact of large language models on medical writing and publishing: current applications, challenges and future directions.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  9. Applications of Large Language Models in Pathology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Nino FijačkoUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Maribor, Slovenia.
Ruth Masterson CreberColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
Benjamin S AbellaCenter for Resuscitation Science and Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Primož KocbekUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Maribor, Slovenia.
Špela MetličarUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Maribor, Slovenia.
Robert GreifERC Research Net, Niels, Belgium.
Gregor ŠtiglicUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Maribor, Slovenia.
University of Maribor · SIColumbia University · USSigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien · ATUniversity of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to use generative artificial intelligence to perform bibliometric analysis on abstracts published at European Resuscitation Council (ERC) annual scientific congress and define trends in ERC guidelines topics over the last decade. Methods: In this bibliometric analysis, the WebHarvy software (SysNucleus, India) was used to download data from the Resuscitation journal's website through the technique of web scraping. Next, the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (ChatGPT-4) application programming interface (Open AI, USA) was used to implement the multinomial classification of abstract titles following the ERC 2021 guidelines topics. Results: From 2012 to 2022 a total of 2491 abstracts have been published at ERC congresses. Published abstracts ranged from 88 (in 2020) to 368 (in 2015). On average, the most common ERC guidelines topics were Conclusion: This study demonstrates the capabilities of generative artificial intelligence in the bibliometric analysis of abstract titles using the example of resuscitation medicine research over the last decade at ERC conferences using large language models.

Indexed as

Bibliometrics analysisCongressEmergency medicineEuropean Resuscitation CouncilGenerative artificial intelligence

Identifiers

PMID38420596
PMCPMC10899017
OpenAlexW4392067260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.