ArticleJTCVS open2024
Comprehensive sampling of the lung microbiome in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in JTCVS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing the microbiome: a new frontier in lung cancer immunotherapy.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Review
- Integrative Analysis of Multiomic Pathways Predicts Cancer-Affected Lobes in Lung Cancer.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Microflora: a promising potential in the diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Lung microbiome dynamics in health and lung cancer.Microbial genomics · 2025Review
- Investigation of pure lung microbiota in patients with lung cancer after eliminating upper airway contamination: a prospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Data are scarce on whether the composition of the lung microbiome (extending from the nasopharynx to the peripheral lung tissue) varies according to histology or grade of non-small cell lung cancer. We hypothesized that the composition of the lung microbiome would vary according to the histology and the grade of non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: We collected naso-oral and central lobar (cancer affected, ipsilateral unaffected, and contralateral unaffected) bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and brushing samples from patients with clinical early-stage lung cancer between July 2018 and February 2020 at a single academic center. We performed bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing and then compared clinical and pathologic findings with microbiome signatures. Results: Samples were collected from 28 patients. Microbial composition in affected lobes displayed unique enrichment of oropharyngeal bacterial species that was significantly different compared with that from the unaffected contralateral lobes; patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had similar diversity to those without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( Conclusions: The lung microbiota differs between cancer affected and unaffected lobes in the same patient. Furthermore, poorly differentiated lung cancers were associated with lower microbial diversity. Larger studies will be required to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.