Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38420488›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Research on the construction of a "full-chain" rapid response system for power emergencies.

Su Zhang, Xiaolu Liu, Jingui Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Su ZhangCollege of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350116, China.
Xiaolu LiuCollege of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350116, China.
Jingui WangCollege of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350116, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial industry for improving society's sustainable development is the power sector. To address issues with the ineffectiveness of electric power emergency response during emergencies and the unclear division of duty among emergency subjects. A prefecture-level city power supply company to respond to the "In-Fa" typhoon, for example, to build a "1 + N" two-level emergency rapid response unit. Furthermore, it is proposed from the emergency response, emergency coordination, emergency material reserves, etc., to build a "full-chain" type of power emergency quick reaction system. Case studies have revealed that the quick response system's emergency combat capability, catastrophe preventive and mitigation capability, and emergency security capability have all improved. The construction of a "full-chain" type of power emergency rapid response system specialized and standardized the power emergency response system and provided a reference basis for the power industry's emergency response.

Indexed as

Electric power systemEmergency quick responseInternal and external coordinationMulti-linkageStandardization

Identifiers

PMID38420488
PMCPMC10901016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.