Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38420477›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

The effect of environmental credit rating on audit fees: A quasi-natural experiment from China.

Jianghan Wang, Haiyan Zhong, Minxin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianghan WangSchool of Economics and Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443002, China.
Haiyan ZhongSchool of Economics and Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443002, China.
Minxin LiSchool of Business, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, 314001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental credit rating (ECR) is a new policy that deeply integrates the construction of ecological civilisation and the social credit system in China; however, there is a paucity of research on the response of external auditors to the ECR. This study takes the environmental credit evaluation policy implementation as a quasi-natural experiment, using China's A-share listed companies in heavily polluting industries from 2008 to 2019 as samples. We construct a heterogeneous timing difference-in-differences model to empirically explore the impact of ECR on audit fees. The results show that the ECR significantly reduces companies' audit fees. Importantly, our analysis suggests that the ECR improves environmental information transparency and enhances sustainable operation ability, thereby reducing audit fees. Further analysis shows that the negative correlation between the ECR and audit fees is more obvious in non-state enterprises, in poor legal environments and low levels of trust. Our study provides scientific evidence for the economic consequences of the environmental credit evaluation policy and enriches the literature on the factors affecting audit fees. It has revelatory significance for China and other developing countries to implement and improve the environmental credit evaluation policies and better guide enterprises to fulfil their environmental responsibilities.

Indexed as

Audit feesEnvironmental credit ratingEnvironmental information transparencyQuasi-natural experimentSustainable operation ability

Identifiers

PMID38420477
PMCPMC10901101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.