Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38420398›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Bibliometric analysis and review of mine ventilation literature published between 2010 and 2023.

Yan Xue, Jinmiao Wang, Jun Xiao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan XueSchool of Environment and Resources, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, China.
Jinmiao WangSchool of Environment and Resources, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, China.
Jun XiaoSchool of Environment and Resources, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To provide scholars with a quick understanding of the current status, research hotspots, and future trends in the field of mine ventilation, this paper conducted a visualized bibliometric analysis and a comprehensive review of mine ventilation-related literature from 2010 to 2023 using CiteSpace. A thorough analysis of the publication time, co-authorship, co-citation, keywords, and research topics of the literature was carried out. Based on this, through systematic literature reading and summarization, research topics in the field of mine ventilation were organized, analyzed, and classified. The results indicate that mine ventilation research from 2010 to 2023 went through three stages: stable development, slow growth, and rapid ascent. Nie Wen and China Univ Min & Technol were the most prolific authors and institutions in the field of mine ventilation. China had the highest number of publications during 2010-2023, while Canada and Poland exhibited the highest centrality, signifying their key roles in the mine ventilation domain. Deep mine ventilation and intelligent mine ventilation emerged as research hotspots and mainstream trends in the future. The analysis of multiple hazard coupling studies represents a research direction that mine ventilation needs to develop. Numerical simulation techniques should not be limited to static analysis, as dynamic simulation is a focal area of interest.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisCiteSpaceMine ventilationVisualization analysis

Identifiers

PMID38420398
PMCPMC10900403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.