ArticleHeliyon2024
Automated highway pavement crack recognition under complex environment.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CrackNet-Weather: An Effective Pavement Crack Detection Method Under Adverse Weather Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pavement is vulnerable to damage from natural disasters, accidents and other human factors, resulting in the formation of cracks. Periodic pavement monitoring can facilitate prompt detection and repair the pavement diseases, thereby minimizing casualties and property losses. Due to the presence of numerous interferences, recognizing highway pavement cracks in complex environments poses a significant challenge. Nevertheless, several computer vision approaches have demonstrated notable success in tackling this issue. We have employed a novel approach for crack recognition utilizing the ResNet34 model with a convolutional block attention module (CBAM), which not only saves parameters and computing power but also ensures seamless integration of the module as a plug-in. Initially, ResNet18, ResNet34, and ResNet50 models were trained by employing transfer learning techniques, with the ResNet34 network being selected as a fundamental model. Subsequently, CBAM was integrated into ResBlock and further training was conducted. Finally, we calculated the precision, average recall on the test set, and the recall of each class. The results demonstrate that by integrating CBAM into the ResNet34 network, the model exhibited improved test accuracy and average recall compared to its previous state. Moreover, our proposed model outperformed all other models in terms of performance. The recall rates for transverse crack, longitudinal crack, map crack, repairing, and pavement marking were 88.8%, 86.8%, 88.5%, 98.3%, and 99.9%, respectively. Our model achieves the highest precision of 92.9% and the highest average recall of 92.5%. However, the effectiveness in detecting mesh cracks was found to be unsatisfactory, despite their significant prevalence. In summary, the proposed model exhibits great potential for crack identification and serves as a crucial foundation for highway maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.