Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38420361›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

A new score for airway assessment using clinical and ultrasound parameters.

Nekari De Luis-Cabezón, Diana Ly-Liu, Pablo Renedo-Corcostegui, Francisco Santaolalla-Montoya, Aitor Zabala-Lopez de Maturana, Jose Carlos Herrero-Herrero, Eugenio Martínez-Hurtado, Raúl De Frutos-Parra, Amaia Bilbao-Gonzalez, Miguel Angel Fernandez-Vaquero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Airway Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nekari De Luis-CabezónDepartment of Anesthesiology, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Diana Ly-LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Pablo Renedo-CorcosteguiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Francisco Santaolalla-MontoyaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Aitor Zabala-Lopez de MaturanaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Jose Carlos Herrero-HerreroDepartment of Anesthesiology, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Eugenio Martínez-HurtadoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
Raúl De Frutos-ParraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Amaia Bilbao-GonzalezUnidad de Investigación e Innovación, RICAPPS, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Miguel Angel Fernandez-VaqueroDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Osakidetza · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESHospital de Basurto · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Over the last few years, ultrasonography has been introduced as the fifth pillar to patient's bedside physical examination. Clinical assessments aim to screen and look for airway difficulties to predict difficult intubations, but none have demonstrated a significant predictive capacity. Recent systematic reviews have established a correlation between ultrasound imaging and difficult direct laryngoscopy. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether the utilization of ultrasonography to examine the upper airway could accurately predict difficult direct laryngoscopy. Methods: This is a prospective observational study including 102 adult patients that required general anesthesia for elective surgery. Preoperatively, clinical airway assessments were performed. Data such as Mallampati-Samsoon grade (MS), upper lip bite test (ULBT), thyromental (TMD) and sternomental distance (SMD), cervical circumference (CC) and the Arné risk index were collected. Ultrasound evaluation was taken at five different levels in two planes, parasagittal and transverse. Therefore, the following measurements were registered: distance from skin to hyoid bone (DSHB), distance from skin to thyrohyoid membrane (DSTHM), distance from skin to epiglottis (DSE), distance from skin to thyroid cartilage (DSTC) and distance from hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage (DHBTC). Patients were divided into two groups based on the difficulty to perform direct laryngoscopy, according to Cormack-Lehane (C-L) classification. Grades I and II were classified as easy laryngoscopy and grades III or IV as difficult. Logistic regression models and the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to determine the diagnostic precision of ultrasound measurements to distinguish difficult laryngoscopy (DL). Results: The following risk score for DL was obtained, DSTHM ≥ 1.60 cm (2 points), DSTC ≥ 0.78 cm (3 points) and gender (2 points for males). The score can range from 0 to 7 points, and showed and AUC (95% CI) of 0.84 (0.74-0.95). A score of 5 points or higher indicates a 34-fold increase in the risk of finding DL ( Conclusion: The use of ultrasonography combined with classic clinical screening tests are useful tools to predict difficult direct laryngoscopy.

Indexed as

airway managementanesthesiadifficult laryngoscopyintubationscoresultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38420361
PMCPMC10899447
OpenAlexW4391820193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.