ArticleBiomedical optics express2023
Depth-selective method for time-domain diffuse reflectance measurements: validation study of the dual subtraction technique.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Weighting scheme for robust depth normalization in reflectance time-domain diffuse optical tomography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Relationship Between Signals from Cerebral near Infrared Spectroscopy Sensor Technology and Objectively Measured Cerebral Blood Volume: A Systematic Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Optimizing spatial accuracy in electroencephalography reconstruction through diffuse optical tomography priors in the auditory cortex.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Phase-based structured interrogation frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2024Article
- Spatial Sensitivity to Absorption Changes for Various Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Methods: A Compendium Review.Journal of innovative optical health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on the spatial distribution of sensitivity of time-domain near infrared diffuse reflectance measurement is reported in this paper. The main objective of the investigation is to validate theoretically calculated sensitivity profiles for a measurement geometry with two detectors and two sources in which sensitivity profiles of statistical moments of distributions of time of flight of photons (DTOFs) are spatially restricted to a region underneath the detectors. For this dual subtraction method, smaller sensitivities to changes appearing in the superficial layer of the medium were observed compared to the single distance and single subtraction methods. Experimental validation of this approach is based on evaluation of changes in the statistical moments of DTOFs measured on a liquid phantom with local absorption perturbations. The spatial distributions of sensitivities, depth-related sensitivity and depth selectivities were obtained from the dual subtraction method and compared with those from single distance and single subtraction approaches. Also, the contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for the dual subtraction technique and combined with depth selectivity in order to assess the overall performance (product of CNR and depth selectivity) of the method. Spatial sensitivity profiles from phantom experiments are in a good agreement with the results of theoretical studies and feature more locally restricted sensitivity volume with the point of maximal sensitivity located deeper. The highest value of overall performance was obtained experimentally for the second statistical moment in the dual subtraction method (∼10.8) surpassing that of the single distance method (∼8.7). This confirms the advantage of dual subtraction measurement geometries in the suppression of optical signals originated in the superficial layer of the medium.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.