Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38420218›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024

A detailed sensitivity analysis identifies the key factors influencing the enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass.

Partho Sakha De, Jasmin Theilmann, Adélaïde Raguin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Partho Sakha DeInstitute for Computational Cell Biology, Heinrich Heine University, Universitätsstr. 1, Düsseldorf, 40225, NRW, Germany.
Jasmin TheilmannInstitute for Computational Cell Biology, Heinrich Heine University, Universitätsstr. 1, Düsseldorf, 40225, NRW, Germany.
Adélaïde RaguinInstitute for Computational Cell Biology, Heinrich Heine University, Universitätsstr. 1, Düsseldorf, 40225, NRW, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corn stover is the most abundant form of crop residue that can serve as a source of lignocellulosic biomass in biorefinery approaches, for instance for the production of bioethanol. In such biorefinery processes, the constituent polysaccharide biopolymers are typically broken down into simple monomeric sugars by enzymatic saccharification, for further downstream fermentation into bioethanol. However, the recalcitrance of this material to enzymatic saccharification invokes the need for innovative pre-treatment methods to increase sugar conversion yield. Here, we focus on experimental glucose conversion time-courses for corn stover lignocellulose that has been pre-treated with different acid-catalysed processes and intensities. We identify the key parameters that determine enzymatic saccharification dynamics by performing a Sobol's sensitivity analysis on the comparison between the simulation results from our complex stochastic biophysical model, and the experimental data that we accurately reproduce. We find that the parameters relating to cellulose crystallinity and those associated with the cellobiohydrolase activity are predominantly driving the enzymatic saccharification dynamics. We confirm our computational results using mathematical calculations for a purely cellulosic substrate. On the one hand, having identified that only five parameters drastically influence the saccharification dynamics allows us to reduce the dimensionality of the parameter space (from nineteen to five parameters), which we expect will significantly speed up our fitting algorithm for comparison of experimental and simulated saccharification time-courses. On the other hand, these parameters directly highlight key targets for experimental endeavours in the optimisation of pre-treatment and saccharification conditions. Finally, this systematic and two-fold theoretical study, based on both mathematical and computational approaches, provides experimentalists with key insights that will support them in rationalising their complex experimental results.

Identifiers

PMID38420218
PMCPMC10900831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.