Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38420107›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Clinical care of childhood sexual abuse: a systematic review and critical appraisal of guidelines from European countries.

Gabriel Otterman, Ulugbek B Nurmatov, Ather Akhlaq, Laura Korhonen, Alison M Kemp, Aideen Naughton, Martin Chalumeau, Andreas Jud, Mary Jo Vollmer Sandholm, Eva Mora-Theuer and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Gabriel OttermanBarnafrid and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Ulugbek B NurmatovDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Ather AkhlaqInstitute of Business Management, Karachi, Pakistan.
Laura KorhonenBarnafrid and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Alison M KempDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Aideen NaughtonNational Safeguarding Service, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Martin ChalumeauChild Protection Unit - Department of General Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Necker-Enfants malades Hospital, France.
Andreas JudClinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ulm University Clinics, Ulm, Germany.
Mary Jo Vollmer SandholmDepartment of Forensic Sciences, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway.
Eva Mora-TheuerDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sarah MoultriePediatric Trauma Services, Benioff Children's Hospitals- Oakland, Oakland, CA, USA.
Diogo LamelaDigital Human-Environment Interaction Lab (HEI-Lab), Lusófona University, Porto, Portugal.
Nara Tagiyeva-MilneDepartment of Education, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Joanne NelsonChild and Adolescent Sexual Assault Treatment Service, Barnahus West, Saolta University Health Care Group, Galway, Ireland.
Jordan GreenbaumInternational Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, Alexandria, VA, USA.
COST Action 19106 Research Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The clinical management of Child sexual abuse (CSA) demands specialised skills from healthcare professionals due to its sensitivity, legal implications, and serious physical health and mental health effects. Standardised, comprehensive clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) may be pivotal. In this systematic review, we examined existing CSA national CPGs (NCPGs) from European countries to assess their quality and reporting. Methods: We systematically searched six international databases and multiple grey literature sources, reporting by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. Eligible guidelines were CSA guidance from national health agencies or societies in 34 COST Action 19106 Network Countries (CANC), published between January 2012 and November 2022. Two independent researchers searched, screened, reviewed, and extracted data. NCPGs were compared for completeness with reference WHO 2017 and 2019 guidelines. We used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) to appraise quality and reporting. Findings: Of 2919 records identified by database searches, none met inclusion criteria. Of 4714 records identified by other methods, 24 NCPGs from 17 (50%) of CANC countries were included. In 17 (50%) of eligible countries, no NCPGs were found. Content varied significantly within and between countries. NCPGs lacked many components in state-of-the art clinical practice compared to WHO reference standards, particularly in safety and risk assessment, interactions with caregivers, and mental health interventions. Appraisal by AGREE II revealed shortcomings in NCPG development, regarding scientific rigour, stakeholder involvement, implementation and evaluation. Interpretation: A notable number of European countries lack an NCPG; existing NCPGs often fall short. The healthcare response to CSA in Europe requires a coordinated approach to develop and implement high-quality CPGs. We advocate for a multidisciplinary team to develop a pan-European CSA guideline to ensure quality care for survivors. Funding: Funding was provided by the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children.

Indexed as

Child maltreatmentChild sexual abuseClinical guidelinesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38420107
PMCPMC10899013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.