ReviewCureus2024
Hyperacute Serum and Knee Osteoarthritis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autologous Peripheral Blood-Derived Orthobiologics for the Management of Elbow Disorders: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Autologous Peripheral Blood-Derived Orthobiologics for the Management of Shoulder Disorders: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Platelet Lysate and Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.Pain and therapy · 2024Review
- Autologous Growth Factor-Rich Concentrate (GFC) Injection in Non-union of Fractures: A Quasi-experimental Study.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Gold-Induced Cytokine (GOLDIC) for the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Review
- Article
- Growth Factor Concentrate (GFC) for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Systematic Review.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The knees are the most frequently affected weight-bearing joints in osteoarthritis (OA), impacting millions of people globally. With increasing life spans and obesity rates, the prevalence of knee OA will further mount, leading to a significant increase in the economic burden. The usual treatment modalities utilized to manage knee OA have shortcomings. Over the last decade, the field of regenerative medicine involving the use of biologics, such as autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics, including hyperacute serum (HS), has evolved and shown potential for managing knee OA. In this manuscript, we qualitatively present the in vitro, pre-clinical, clinical, and ongoing studies investigating the applications of HS in the context of knee OA. Seven in vitro studies and one clinical study fit the scope of our manuscript. The results demonstrated that the administration of HS is potentially safe and efficacious in terms of increasing the viability of osteoarthritic chondrocytes, reducing pain and inflammation, and improving function in patients with knee OA. However, due to insufficient literature, pre-clinical studies to better understand the mechanism of action are required. In addition, adequately powered, multi-center, non-randomized, and randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up are warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of HS for the management of knee OA and to justify its clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.