ArticleCureus2024
Impact of Introducing a Controlled-Release Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Labor Induction: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Japan.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Labor Induction Outcomes and Short-Term Safety of Controlled-Release Vaginal Dinoprostone in Women Beyond 36 Weeks of Gestation: A Prospective Observational Study in Vietnam.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Article
- Ultrasound-guided insertion of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal delivery system (PROPESS).Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimCervical ripening is commonly performed before oxytocin administration during labor induction in pregnant women with an unfavorable cervix. In Japan, a controlled-release Dinoprostone vaginal insert (CR-DVI) was approved in 2020. Although many studies have compared the mechanical methods of ripening and prostaglandins, few have examined the impact of additional options for labor induction. This study aimed to assess the impact of CR-DVI as an additional option for labor induction in women with an unfavorable cervix.
methodsIn this single-center retrospective study conducted in Japan, 265 participants were divided into two groups: before (January 2018 to May 2020) and after (June 2020 to November 2022) CR-DVI introduction. Before CR-DVI was introduced, hygroscopic dilators were used for all cases instead. On the other hand, after the introduction of CR-DVI, the first choice for cervical ripening was CR-DVI. The CR-DVI was retained vaginally for up to 12 hours after insertion. However, if hyper-stimulation or non-reassuring fetal status was suspected, or if a new membrane rupture occurred, it was removed immediately according to the removal criteria. Oxytocin infusions were used during both periods if needed. We compared delivery and neonatal outcomes between the groups.
resultsThe 265 participants were divided into two groups: before (n=116) and after (n=149) CR-DVI introduction. There were no significant differences in maternal characteristics except for the primiparous proportion. CR-DVI was used in 93% of cases after introduction. Hygroscopic dilators also continued to be used; however, their use decreased to about 34%. The vaginal delivery rate was significantly higher after the introduction of CR-DVI than before its introduction (50.9% vs. 66.4%; p=0.01). Multivariable analysis revealed a significantly higher rate of vaginal delivery after CR-DVI introduction. Of the 149 cases in which a CR-DVI was used, 111 (79.9%) were removed before 12 hours. There were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes.
conclusionThe rate of vaginal delivery was higher after CR-DVI introduction than before its introduction, and adverse pregnancy outcomes did not increase. Therefore, introducing CR-DVI as an option for labor induction may increase the probability of vaginal delivery. Safety can also be ensured by adhering to the removal criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.