Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38420031›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2024

Reduction of acute respiratory infections in day-care by non-pharmaceutical interventions: a narrative review.

Lars Andrup, Karen A Krogfelt, Lene Stephansen, Kristian Schultz Hansen, Brian Krogh Graversen, Peder Wolkoff, Anne Mette Madsen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lars AndrupThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karen A KrogfeltDepartment of Science and Environment, Molecular and Medical Biology, PandemiX Center, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Lene StephansenGladsaxe Municipality, Social and Health Department, Gladsaxe, Denmark.
Kristian Schultz HansenThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Brian Krogh GraversenThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peder WolkoffThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne Mette MadsenThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
National Research Centre for the Working Environment · DKRoskilde University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Children who start in day-care have 2-4 times as many respiratory infections compared to children who are cared for at home, and day-care staff are among the employees with the highest absenteeism. The extensive new knowledge that has been generated in the COVID-19 era should be used in the prevention measures we prioritize. The purpose of this narrative review is to answer the questions: Which respiratory viruses are the most significant in day-care centers and similar indoor environments? What do we know about the transmission route of these viruses? What evidence is there for the effectiveness of different non-pharmaceutical prevention measures? Design: Literature searches with different terms related to respiratory infections in humans, mitigation strategies, viral transmission mechanisms, and with special focus on day-care, kindergarten or child nurseries, were conducted in PubMed database and Web of Science. Searches with each of the main viruses in combination with transmission, infectivity, and infectious spread were conducted separately supplemented through the references of articles that were retrieved. Results: Five viruses were found to be responsible for ≈95% of respiratory infections: rhinovirus, (RV), influenza virus (IV), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), coronavirus (CoV), and adenovirus (AdV). Novel research, emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggests that most respiratory viruses are primarily transmitted in an airborne manner carried by aerosols (microdroplets). Conclusion: Since airborne transmission is dominant for the most common respiratory viruses, the most important preventive measures consist of better indoor air quality that reduces viral concentrations and viability by appropriate ventilation strategies. Furthermore, control of the relative humidity and temperature, which ensures optimal respiratory functionality and, together with low resident density (or mask use) and increased time outdoors, can reduce the occurrence of respiratory infections.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Tract InfectionsAdenoviridaeChildHumansPandemicsRespiratory Aerosols and Dropletsaerosolscommon coldCOVID-19indoor air qualityinfectious transmission preventioninfluenzaprimary preventionrespiratory syncytial viruses

Identifiers

PMID38420031
PMCPMC10899481
OpenAlexW4391831767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.