ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
A real-world clinicopathological model for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remnant cholesterol inflammatory index for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: A multicenter external validation study.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Beyond pCR Prediction: Subtype-Specific Artificial Intelligence for Treatment Tailoring in Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Post-Treatment ADC and MRI Response Assessment for Predicting Pathological Complete Response in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in ultrasound for preoperative molecular subtyping of malignant breast tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Interpretable Dynamic MRI-ITH Model for Predicting Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Early tumour size changes from neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a predictor of pathologic response in breast cancer.PloS one · 2026Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer Using the Baseline Clinical and Pathological Characteristics.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- 18F-FDG PET/CT-based deep radiomic models for enhancing chemotherapy response prediction in breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Article
- Using baseline MRI radiomics to predict the tumor shrinkage patterns in HR-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Extratumoral Signs of Malignant Nonspiculate and Noncalcified Masses on Mammography: Are They Associated With Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer?The breast journal · 2025Article
- Model based on ultrasound and clinicopathological characteristics for early prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Machine learning in oncological pharmacogenomics: advancing personalized chemotherapy.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate a clinicopathological model to predict pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients and identify key prognostic factors. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 279 breast cancer patients who received NAC at Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from 2011 to 2021. Additionally, an external validation dataset, comprising 50 patients from Lanxi People's Hospital and Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from 2022 to 2023 was utilized for model verification. A multivariate logistic regression model was established incorporating clinical, ultrasound features, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and pathology variables at baseline and post-NAC. Model performance for predicting pCR was evaluated. Prognostic factors were identified using survival analysis. Results: In the 279 patients enrolled, a pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 27.96% (78 out of 279) was achieved. The predictive model incorporated independent predictors such as stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (sTIL) levels, Ki-67 expression, molecular subtype, and ultrasound echo features. The model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy for pCR (C-statistics/AUC 0.874), especially in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched (C-statistics/AUC 0.878) and triple-negative (C-statistics/AUC 0.870) subtypes, and the model performed well in external validation data set (C-statistics/AUC 0.836). Incorporating circulating tumor cell (CTC) changes post-NAC and tumor size changes further improved predictive performance (C-statistics/AUC 0.945) in the CTC detection subgroup. Key prognostic factors included tumor size >5cm, lymph node metastasis, sTIL levels, estrogen receptor (ER) status and pCR. Despite varied pCR rates, overall prognosis after standard systemic therapy was consistent across molecular subtypes. Conclusion: The developed predictive model showcases robust performance in forecasting pCR in NAC-treated breast cancer patients, marking a step toward more personalized therapeutic strategies in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.