Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38419837›Full record

ArticleCerebral circulation - cognition and behavior2024

Perspectives of general practitioners and memory clinic patients on ageing and cognitive decline to inform the design of a decentralised antihypertensive dementia prevention trial.

Alexandra Hurden, Isabella Cotter, Loren Mowszowski, Sharon Naismith, Craig S Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandra HurdenThe George Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Isabella CotterThe George Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Loren MowszowskiBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sharon NaismithBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Craig S AndersonThe George Institute, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global burden dementia is growing each year. Clinical trials investigating approaches to preventing dementia have been occurring for decades, but they are particularly challenging including the requirement to include large numbers of healthy 'at-risk' people who need to be followed up for a long period of time. Community and consumer involvement in trial design helps to ensure that the methods are acceptable to the involved stakeholders, the design and operation of clinical trials are suitable and applicable to the target population, and that key areas of concern are identified and addressed at an early stage.

objectivesTo gain insights from samples of memory clinic patients without dementia and general practitioners on the acceptability of, and attitudes towards, the proposed design of a decentralised antihypertensive dementia prevention trial. Topics addressed included the assessment of cognition, antihypertensive medication use, and motivation to participate in research.

methodsTwo focus groups (total

resultsThe proposed design was acceptable, with some possible barriers identified regarding computer use, GP time restraints, and concerns about medication interactions. Additional themes included the importance of communication and social connectedness in research participation and perceptions of ageing in medical settings. Future directions of research into larger studies and consumer-led research practices were discussed.

conclusionThe proposed trial design was agreed to be acceptable with some operational considerations, which were incorporated in the trial design.

Indexed as

Blood pressureDementiaDementia preventionFocus groupInterviewTrial design

Identifiers

PMID38419837
PMCPMC10899054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.