Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38419825›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2023

Essential requirements for the governance and management of data trusts, data repositories, and other data collaborations.

P Alison Paprica, Monique Crichlow, Donna Curtis Maillet, Sarah Kesselring, Conrad Pow, Thomas P Scarnecchia, Michael J Schull, Rosario G Cartagena, Annabelle Cumyn, Salman Dostmohammad and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The promise of big data: don't fence me in.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Research data use in a digital society: a deliberative public engagement.International journal of population data science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

P Alison PapricaInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6.
Monique CrichlowIndoc Research, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3W4.
Donna Curtis MailletNew Brunswick Institute for Research, Data and Training (NB-IRDT), University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3A 5A3.
Sarah KesselringHealth Data Research Network Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3.
Conrad PowDiabetes Action Canada, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4.
Thomas P ScarnecchiaDigital Aurora, Inc., Manchester, Vermont 05254.
Michael J SchullInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5.
Rosario G CartagenaInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5.
Annabelle CumynUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1K 2R1.
Salman DostmohammadPublic Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0K9.
Keith O EllistonSeneca Creek Research, 209 Burlington Road, Suite 207, Bedford MA, 01730, USA (formerly affiliated with PHEMI).
Michelle GreiverNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, M2K 1E1.
Amy Hawn NelsonUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104.
Sean L HillKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1R8.
Wanrudee IsaranuwatchaiInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6.
Evgueni LoukipoudisCatalyx Tecnologies Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 3A4.
James Ted McDonaldNew Brunswick Institute for Research, Data and Training (NB-IRDT), University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3A 5A3.
John R McLaughlinDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M7.
Alan RabinowitzSt Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6.
Fahad RazakInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6.
Stefaan G VerhulstThe GovLab, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, New York, 11201.
Amol A VermaInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6.
J Charles VictorInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6.
Andrew YoungThe GovLab, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, New York, 11201.
Joanna YuKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1R8.
Kimberlyn McGrailHealth Data Research Network Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Around the world, many organisations are working on ways to increase the use, sharing, and reuse of person-level data for research, evaluation, planning, and innovation while ensuring that data are secure and privacy is protected. As a contribution to broader efforts to improve data governance and management, in 2020 members of our team published 12 minimum specification essential requirements (min specs) to provide practical guidance for organisations establishing or operating data trusts and other forms of data infrastructure. Approach and Aims: We convened an international team, consisting mostly of participants from Canada and the United States of America, to test and refine the original 12 min specs. Twenty-three (23) data-focused organisations and initiatives recorded the various ways they address the min specs. Sub-teams analysed the results, used the findings to make improvements to the min specs, and identified materials to support organisations/initiatives in addressing the min specs. Results: Analyses and discussion led to an updated set of 15 min specs covering five categories: one min spec for Legal, five for Governance, four for Management, two for Data Users, and three for Stakeholder & Public Engagement. Multiple changes were made to make the min specs language more technically complete and precise. The updated set of 15 min specs has been integrated into a Canadian national standard that, to our knowledge, is the first to include requirements for public engagement and Indigenous Data Sovereignty. Conclusions: The testing and refinement of the min specs led to significant additions and improvements. The min specs helped the 23 organisations/initiatives involved in this project communicate and compare how they achieve responsible and trustworthy data governance and management. By extension, the min specs, and the Canadian national standard based on them, are likely to be useful for other data-focused organisations and initiatives.

Indexed as

PrivacyCanadaHumansUnited Statesdata collaborationdata governancedata managementdata repositorydata stewardshipdata trustIndigenous Data Sovereigntypublic engagementstandards

Identifiers

PMID38419825
PMCPMC10898504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.