ArticleCase reports in nephrology2024
Recurrent Urolithiasis Revealing Primary Hyperparathyroidism in a Nephrology Department.
Article in Case reports in nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Analysis of Primary Hyperparathyroidism in Individuals Diagnosed with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Urinary lithiasis constitutes a recurrent pathology affecting a relatively young population. The risk of progression to chronic renal failure and the cost of treatment are the most important issues. Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is responsible for urolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis in 7% of patients, and it represents the 7th cause of urolithiasis in Tunisia. Unfortunately, it remains an underdiagnosed pathology although it is curable. We aim to determine the clinical, biological, therapeutic, and evolutionary particularities of urinary lithiasis associated with PHPT in a nephrology setting. Methods: This is a monocentric, retrospective, descriptive study which took place in our nephrology department during the period from January 2010 to January 2023. Ten patients were included. All of them underwent blood and urine tests and a morphoconstitutional study of the urinary stones if possible. Results: The median age at diagnosis of PHPT was 42 years (34-54). The median time from the onset of kidney stones to the diagnosis of PHPT was 6.2 years (1-17). The male/female gender ratio was 0.66. Five patients had hypertension, two patients had obesity, one patient had diabetes, and three patients had urinary tract infections. Kidney stones were bilateral in eight cases and unilateral in two cases. Nine patients underwent urological intervention: surgery in 5 cases associated with nephrectomy in one case, extracorporeal lithotripsy in 4 cases, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in two cases. The diagnosis of PHPT was retained with high or uncontrolled PTH associated with hypercalcemia in 8 cases and normocalcemic PHPT was found in 2 patients. Two patients had parathyroid adenoma and one patient had mediastinal adenoma. Radiology exploration was normal for the others patients. Surgery was performed in 7 patients and histology revealed an adenoma in 5 cases and hyperplasia in one case. The predominant urinary risk factors in our study were hypercalciuria in 6 cases and insufficient diuresis in 4 cases. Conclusion: This study underlines the role of the nephrologist in the exploration of urinary lithiasis and the prevention of recurrences, especially as PHPT is a curable aetiology of urolithiasis and affects a relatively young population. The determination of the epidemiological profile of patients with stones associated with primary PHPT and lithogenic risk factors allows the primary and secondary prevention of stone formation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.