Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38419740›Full record

ArticleJournal of sol-gel science and technology2024

The poor reliability of thermal conductivity data in the aerogel literature: a call to action!

Wim J Malfait, Hans-Peter Ebert, Samuel Brunner, Jannis Wernery, Sandra Galmarini, Shanyu Zhao, Gudrun Reichenauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sol-gel science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Data-Driven Review on Aerogels and Polymeric Aerogels.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  8. Closed-Loop Recyclable Polyhexahydrotriazine Aerogels Derived From PET Waste.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wim J MalfaitLaboratory for Building Energy Materials and Components, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Hans-Peter EbertCenter for Applied Energy Research (CAE), Würzburg, Germany.
Samuel BrunnerLaboratory for Building Energy Materials and Components, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Jannis WerneryLaboratory for Building Energy Materials and Components, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Sandra GalmariniLaboratory for Building Energy Materials and Components, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Shanyu ZhaoLaboratory for Building Energy Materials and Components, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Gudrun ReichenauerCenter for Applied Energy Research (CAE), Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aerogels are an exciting class of materials with record-breaking properties including, in some cases, ultra-low thermal conductivities. The last decade has seen a veritable explosion in aerogel research and industry R&D, leading to the synthesis of aerogels from a variety of materials for a rapidly expanding range of applications. However, both from the research side, and certainly from a market perspective, thermal insulation remains the dominant application. Unfortunately, continued progress in this area suffers from the proliferation of incorrect thermal conductivity data, with values that often are far outside of what is possible within the physical limitations. This loss of credibility in reported thermal conductivity data poses difficulties in comparing the thermal performance of different types of aerogels and other thermal superinsulators, may set back further scientific progress, and hinder technology transfer to industry and society. Here, we have compiled 519 thermal conductivity results from 87 research papers, encompassing silica, other inorganic, biopolymer and synthetic polymer aerogels, to highlight the extent of the problem. Thermal conductivity data outside of what is physically possible are common, even in high profile journals and from the world's best universities and institutes. Both steady-state and transient methods can provide accurate thermal conductivity data with proper instrumentation, suitable sample materials and experienced users, but nearly all implausible data derive from transient methods, and hot disk measurements in particular, indicating that under unfavorable circumstances, and in the context of aerogel research, transient methods are more prone to return unreliable data. Guidelines on how to acquire reliable thermal conductivity data are provided. This paper is a call to authors, reviewers, editors and readers to exercise caution and skepticism when they report, publish or interpret thermal conductivity data. Graphical Abstract:

Indexed as

Data integrityQuality controlSample conditioningSuperinsulation

Identifiers

PMID38419740
PMCPMC10896818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.