Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38419516›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2024

Chyle leak after head and neck surgeries: a comprehensive review of diagnosis and management strategies.

Aparna Ganesan, Nehal C Singh, Naren P Khatri, Charanjeet Singh Madaan, Savreek Kaur, Amanjot Kaur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aparna GanesanDepartment of Oral Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-2651
Nehal C SinghDepartment of Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0514-1569
Naren P KhatriDepartment of Orthopedics, Zydus Sitapur Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5140-971X
Charanjeet Singh MadaanSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2648-662X
Savreek KaurSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6876-2456
Amanjot KaurDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jammu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-0140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chyle leaks are uncommon complications after head and neck surgeries. Although uncommon, such a complication is noteworthy mention due to its perplexing diagnosis and management strategies. This scoping review aims to highlight and emphasize the diagnosis and management options proposed in the literature. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases and identified 617 articles that were reduced to 40 studies and reports after applying the eligibility criteria. Although numerous treatment options ranging from simple, conservative measures to invasive surgical procedures have been mentioned for low-output, high-output, and massive leaks, there is no concrete evidence on the best method. Thus, a combination of management options must be customized by case for optimum results.

Indexed as

ChyleNeck dissectionOctreotideThoracic duct

Identifiers

PMID38419516
PMCPMC10910005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.