Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38419507›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2024

The Medicare Care Choices Model was associated with reductions in disparities in the use of hospice care for Medicare beneficiaries with terminal illness.

Matthew J Niedzwiecki, Lauren Vollmer Forrow, Jonathan Gellar, R Vincent Pohl, Arnold Chen, Lynn Miescier, Keith Kranker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J NiedzwieckiMathematica, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9005-9054
Lauren Vollmer ForrowMathematica, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0643-9263
Jonathan GellarMathematica, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6073-8902
R Vincent PohlMathematica, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4272-1434
Arnold ChenMathematica, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8065-4025
Lynn MiescierCenter for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-8722-1919
Keith KrankerMathematica, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9230-5906
Mathematica Policy Research · USCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · US

Funding

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation 75FCMC19D0091/75FCMC20F0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effects of the Medicare Care Choices Model (MCCM) on disparities in hospice use and quality of end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries from underserved groups-those from racial and ethnic minority groups, dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, or living in rural areas. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY

settingMedicare enrollment and claims data from 2013 to 2021 for terminally ill Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries nationwide. STUDY

designThrough MCCM, terminally ill enrolled Medicare beneficiaries received supportive and palliative care services from hospice providers concurrently with curative treatments. Using a matched comparison group, we estimated subgroup-specific effects on hospice use, days at home, and aggressive treatment and multiple emergency department visits in the last 30 days of life. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsThe sample included decedent Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in MCCM and a matched comparison group from the same geographic areas who met model eligibility criteria at time of enrollment: having a diagnosis of cancer, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or HIV/AIDS; living in the community; not enrolled in the Medicare hospice benefit in the previous 30 days; and having at least one hospital stay and three office visits in the previous 12 months. PRINCIPAL

findingsEligible beneficiaries from underserved groups were underrepresented in MCCM. MCCM increased enrollees' hospice use and the number of days at home and reduced aggressive treatment among all subgroups analyzed. MCCM also reduced disparities in hospice use by race and ethnicity and dual eligibility by 4.1 (90% credible interval [CI]: 1.3-6.1) and 2.4 (90% CI: 0.6-4.4) percentage points, respectively. It also reduced disparities in having multiple emergency department visits for rural enrollees by 1.3 (90% CI: 0.1-2.7) percentage points.

conclusionsMCCM increased hospice use and quality of end-of-life care for model enrollees from underserved groups and reduced disparities in hospice use and having multiple emergency department visits.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHospice CareMedicareAgedAged, 80 and overFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansMalePalliative CareTerminal CareTerminally IllUnited Statesdual eligibilityend of lifehealth equity and disparitieshospiceMedicare Care Choices Modelqualityrace and ethnicityrural

Identifiers

PMID38419507
PMCPMC11249828
OpenAlexW4392293122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.