ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
Review of the Evaluation of Pulmonary Hypoplasia as an Important Determinant of Clinical Outcomes in Infants with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated fetal magnetic resonance imaging lung segmentation for rapid lung volume estimation across diverse pulmonary hypoplasia phenotypes.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Asymptomatic diaphragmatic hernia in an elderly patient: case report and review of conservative management.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
- How to personalise ventilation of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia? A simulation study.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Early assessment and analysis of high-risk factors of neurodevelopmental impairment in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary hypoplasia is one of main causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. With most cases diagnosed prenatally, the emphasis is put on prediction of the severity of this defect. Several attempts are made to reduce the mortality and provide optimal prenatal and postnatal care. Appropriate estimation of risk of pulmonary hypoplasia also provides an important inclusion criterion for prenatal intervention. The main tool used for the detection and prediction of pulmonary hypoplasia is ultrasound, with an increasing number of available formulas to estimate the risk of occurrence of this phenomenon and complication associated with it. For most of the formulas used in this measurement method, the main limitations are either gestational-age dependency or limited research. Other imaging methods used to assess the risk of pulmonary hypoplasia involve magnetic resonance imaging and vascular assessment of affected lungs. The limitation in these remains the limited accessibility. Currently, the most widely used indexes are observed-to-expected lungs-to-head ratio and presence of liver herniation. These are the 2 most commonly used measurement methods, as they are the basis for patient qualification for fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion. This article aims to review the evaluation of pulmonary hypoplasia or hypoplastic lung disease as an important determinant of clinical outcomes in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. In this review, we emphasize the importance of early prenatal diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and present a summary of different methods of prenatal risk assessment of lung hypoplasia in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.