Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38419101›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2024

Integrating substance use peer support and screening brief intervention and referral to treatment services in the emergency department: a descriptive study of the ED leads program.

Lynsey Avalone, Monique Lalane, Carla King, Kayna Pfeiffer, Rebecca Linn-Walton, Charles Barron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of an emergency department-based approach to reduce subsequent opioid overdoses.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lynsey AvaloneNYC Health + Hospitals/Office of Behavioral Health, 50 Water Street, New York City, NY, 10004, USA. avalonel@nychhc.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5105-7582
Monique LalaneNYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue, 462 1st Avenue, New York City, NY, 10016, USA.
Carla KingNYC Health + Hospitals/Office of Behavioral Health, 50 Water Street, New York City, NY, 10004, USA.
Kayna PfeifferNYC Health + Hospitals/Office of Behavioral Health, 50 Water Street, New York City, NY, 10004, USA.
Rebecca Linn-WaltonNYC Health + Hospitals/Office of Behavioral Health, 50 Water Street, New York City, NY, 10004, USA.
Charles BarronNYC Health + Hospitals/Office of Behavioral Health, 50 Water Street, New York City, NY, 10004, USA.
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ED Leads program was introduced to 11 emergency departments (EDs) within New York City public hospitals from 2018 to 2019 to address a need for addiction support services in the ED. The purpose of this study is to (i) describe the ED Leads blended licensed-clinician and peer counselor team model in the ED at three hospitals, (ii) provide a descriptive analysis of patient engagement and referrals to substance use disorder (SUD) care post-intervention, and (iii) highlight potential barriers and facilitators to implementing the model.

methodsThe program intended to combine Screening Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment and peer support services. The authors analyzed electronic medical records data for patients encountered by ED Leads in the first 120 days of program launch. Data included the outcome of an encounter when a patient was engaged with one or both staff types, and 7-day attendance at an SUD treatment appointment when a patient accepted a referral within the 11-hospital system.

resultsThere were 1785 patients approached by ED Leads staff during the study period. Engagement differed by staff type and patient demographics, and encounter outcomes varied significantly by hospital. Eighty-four percent (N = 1503) of patients who were approached engaged with at least one staff type, and 6% (N = 86) engaged with both. Patients were predominantly male (N = 1438, 81%) with an average age of 45 (SD = 13), and enrolled in Medicaid (N = 1062, 59%). A majority (N = 801, 45%) had alcohol use disorder. Of the patients who accepted a referral within the system (N = 433), 63% received treatment services within 7 days of the ED Leads encounter, a majority at detoxification treatment (N = 252, 58%).

conclusionsThis study describes the potential value and challenges of implementing a blended peer counselor and licensed clinician model in the ED to provide SUD services. While teams provided a high volume of referrals and the analysis of post-intervention treatment follow up is promising, the blended team model was not fully realized, making it difficult to assess the benefits of this combined service. Further research might examine patient outcomes among ED patients who are offered services by both a peer counselor and licensed clinician.

Indexed as

AlcoholismCrisis InterventionCounselingEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationAddictionBehavioral healthEmergency medicinePeersRecoverySubstance use

Identifiers

PMID38419101
PMCPMC10902983
OpenAlexW4392243190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.