Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38419099›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2024

Emerging methods for measuring physical activity using accelerometry in children and adolescents with neuromotor disorders: a narrative review.

Bailey A Petersen, Kirk I Erickson, Brad G Kurowski, M L Boninger, A Treble-Barna

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bailey A PetersenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. bap87@pitt.edu.
Kirk I EricksonAdventHealth Research Institute Department of Neuroscience, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA.
Brad G KurowskiDivision of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
M L BoningerRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
A Treble-BarnaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

PEDIATRIC NEUROINTENSIVE CARE AND RESUSCITATION RESEARCHT32HD040686 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Robert S B Clark, PATRICK M KOCHANEK · 2000 to 2026
$7.1M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren and adolescents with neuromotor disorders need regular physical activity to maintain optimal health and functional independence throughout their development. To this end, reliable measures of physical activity are integral to both assessing habitual physical activity and testing the efficacy of the many interventions designed to increase physical activity in these children. Wearable accelerometers have been used for children with neuromotor disorders for decades; however, studies most often use disorder-specific cut points to categorize physical activity intensity, which lack generalizability to a free-living environment. No reviews of accelerometer data processing methods have discussed the novel use of machine learning techniques for monitoring physical activity in children with neuromotor disorders.

methodsIn this narrative review, we discuss traditional measures of physical activity (including questionnaires and objective accelerometry measures), the limitations of standard analysis for accelerometry in this unique population, and the potential benefits of applying machine learning approaches. We also provide recommendations for using machine learning approaches to monitor physical activity.

conclusionsWhile wearable accelerometers provided a much-needed method to quantify physical activity, standard cut point analyses have limitations in children with neuromotor disorders. Machine learning models are a more robust method of analyzing accelerometer data in pediatric neuromotor disorders and using these methods over disorder-specific cut points is likely to improve accuracy of classifying both type and intensity of physical activity. Notably, there remains a critical need for further development of classifiers for children with more severe motor impairments, preschool aged children, and children in hospital settings.

Indexed as

AccelerometryExerciseAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansMachine LearningAccelerometryMachine learningNeuromotor disordersPediatricsPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID38419099
PMCPMC10903036
OpenAlexW4392292257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.