Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38419036›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Knowledge, risk perception and uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among internally displaced persons in complex humanitarian emergency setting, Northeast Nigeria.

Saheed Gidado, Melton Musa, Ahmed Ibrahim Ba'aba, Mark Rohit Francis, Lilian Akudo Okeke, Fatima Lawan Bukar, Patrick M Nguku, Idris Suleman Hadejia, Isa Ali Hassan, Ibrahim Muhammad Bande and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Saheed GidadoHealth Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. saheed.gidado@tuni.fi.
Melton MusaAfrican Field Epidemiology Network, Borno State Field Office, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Ahmed Ibrahim Ba'abaAfrican Field Epidemiology Network, Yobe State Field Office, Damaturu, Nigeria.
Mark Rohit FrancisHealth Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Lilian Akudo OkekeAfrican Field Epidemiology Network, Adamawa State Field Office, Yola, Nigeria.
Fatima Lawan BukarDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria.
Patrick M NgukuAfrican Field Epidemiology Network, Nigeria Country Office, Abuja, Nigeria.
Idris Suleman HadejiaDepartment of Community Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria.
Isa Ali HassanBorno State Ministry of Health, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria.
Ibrahim Muhammad BandeDepartment of Disease Control and Immunization, Yobe State Primary Health Care Board, Damaturu, Yobe State, Nigeria.
Martins OnuohaNigerian Correctional Service, Adamawa State Office, Yola, Adamawa State, Nigeria.
Rabi UsmanResolve to Save Lives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Gideon UgbenyoAfrican Field Epidemiology Network, Nigeria Country Office, Abuja, Nigeria.
Ntadom GodwinEpidemiology Division, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria.
Elsie IloriNigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Abuja, Nigeria.
Aisha Aliyu AbulfathiDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria.
Lawi Auta MsheliaBorno State Primary Health Care Development Agency, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria.
Abede Momoh MohammedWorld Health Organization, Borno State Office, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Muhammad Maijawa AbdullahiNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Abuja, Nigeria.
Mohammed Isa BammamiYobe State Hospitals Management Board, Damaturu, Yobe State, Nigeria.
Pekka NuortiHealth Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Salla AtkinsHealth Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
African Field Epidemiology Network · NGTampere University · FIUniversity of Maiduguri · NGAdamawa State University · NGAhmadu Bello University · NGFederal Ministry of Health · NGNational Primary Health Care Development Agency · NGNigeria Centre for Disease Control · NGWorld Health Organization - Nigeria · NGYobe State University · NG

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOwing to crowded and unsanitary conditions, internally displaced persons (IDPs) have an increased risk of COVID-19 infection. Adoption of COVID-19 preventive measures among this population is premised on accurate information, adequate knowledge, and risk perception. We assessed COVID-19 knowledge and risk perception and investigated the association between risk perception and COVID-19 preventive measures, including vaccination among IDPs in Northeast Nigeria.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study during July-December 2022 and sampled 2,175 IDPs using stratified sampling. We utilized a 12-point assessment tool to evaluate COVID-19 knowledge. Participants who scored ≥ 6 points were considered to have adequate knowledge. We used a 30-item Risk Behavior Diagnosis Scale to assess COVID-19 risk perception and evaluated each item on a 5-point Likert scale. Participants were divided into risk perception categories by the median of Likert scale scores. We performed weighted logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with risk perception. Pearson's chi-squared with Rao-Scott adjustment was used to determine the relationship between risk perception and COVID-19 preventive measures.

resultsOf 2,175 participants, 55.7% were 18-39 years old, 70.9% were females, and 81.7% had no formal education. Among the IDPs, 32.0% (95% CI: 28.8 - 35.0) were considered to have adequate COVID-19 knowledge, and 51.3% (95% CI: 47.8 - 54.8) perceived COVID-19 risk as high. Moreover, 46.3% (95% CI: 42.8 - 50.0) had received one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, and 33.1% (95% CI: 29.8 - 36.0) received two doses. Adequate knowledge (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 2.10, [95% CI: 1.46 - 3.03]) and post-primary education (AOR = 3.20, [95% CI: 1.59 - 6.46]) were associated with risk perception. Furthermore, high risk perception was significantly associated with wearing face masks (χ

conclusionsThis study revealed gaps in COVID-19 knowledge, risk perception, and vaccination uptake but demonstrated a significant relationship between risk perception and COVID-19 preventive practices. Health education and risk communication should be intensified to improve knowledge, elicit stronger risk perception, and enhance COVID-19 preventive practices.

Indexed as

COVID-19RefugeesRelief WorkAdolescentAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNigeriaPerceptionVaccinationYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccinesCross-sectional studyInternally displaced personsNigeriaPerception

Identifiers

PMID38419036
PMCPMC10902942
OpenAlexW4392240338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.