Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38419032›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Randomized controlled trial of compressive cryotherapy versus standard cryotherapy after total knee arthroplasty: pain, swelling, range of motion and functional recovery.

Aude Quesnot, Simon Mouchel, Salma Ben Salah, Ilana Baranes, Lucas Martinez, Fabien Billuart

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06037824 nacompletednot on this map

Influence of Compressive Cryotherapy Compared to Conventional Cryotherapy on Articular, Trophic and Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut de Formation en Masso-Kinésithérapie Saint MichelRan2019 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsKnee Arthropathy, Cryotherapy EffectArmscryotherapy
NCT07516327 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Cold and Compression After Rotator Cuff Repair or Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Pain Attenuation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOchsner Health SystemRan2026 to 2029Enrolled90ConditionsHigh-grade Partial or Full Thickness Rotator Cuff TearsArmsSOC (Standard of care), Cold and Compression
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and Safety of Electroacupuncture for Pain Alleviation in Post-Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recovery After Primary Knee Surgery Rehabilitation: Patients' Perspectives on Physical Activity and Quality of Life.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aude QuesnotPT. Laboratoire d'analyse du mouvement, Institut de Formation en Masso- Kinésithérapie Saint Michel / Hôpital de la Porte Verte, 6 Avenue du Maréchal Franchet d'Esperey, Versailles, 78000, France.
Simon MouchelDépartement de chirurgie orthopédique, Groupe Hospitalier du Havre, Le Havre cedex, BP24, 76083, France.
Salma Ben SalahPT. Laboratoire d'analyse du mouvement, Institut de Formation en Masso- Kinésithérapie Saint Michel / Hôpital de la Porte Verte, 6 Avenue du Maréchal Franchet d'Esperey, Versailles, 78000, France.
Ilana BaranesPT. Laboratoire d'analyse du mouvement, Institut de Formation en Masso- Kinésithérapie Saint Michel / Hôpital de la Porte Verte, 6 Avenue du Maréchal Franchet d'Esperey, Versailles, 78000, France.
Lucas MartinezPT. Laboratoire d'analyse du mouvement, Institut de Formation en Masso- Kinésithérapie Saint Michel / Hôpital de la Porte Verte, 6 Avenue du Maréchal Franchet d'Esperey, Versailles, 78000, France. l.martinez@ifmk.fr.
Fabien BilluartUnité de Recherche ERPHAN, Versailles, UR 20201, UVSQ, France.
Hôpital La Porte Verte · FRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRGroupe Hospitalier du Havre · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patients have limited knee range of motion (ROM), trophic changes and pain. Cryotherapy and compression are recommended in the literature, but no study has shown that cryotherapy and compression combined leads to better results than cryotherapy alone. The primary objective was to compare knee ROM after 21 days of rehabilitation post-TKA between patients who underwent rehabilitation with compressive cryotherapy with those who had cryotherapy alone. The secondary objectives were to compare other trophic, pain and functional outcomes.

methodsForty patients were randomized into two groups: Standard Cryotherapy (SC = 20, median age 77 years), which applied cold packs along with their rehabilitation; and Compressive Cryotherapy (CC = 20, median age 76 years), which received cold compression. Knee joint's passive and active ROM (primary outcome) were measured with a goniometer. Knee's circumference, fluctuation test, pain at rest and during activity, 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and KOOS questionnaire were secondary outcomes. The groups were compared on D1 (baseline) and D21 of rehabilitation. A survival analysis has compared the groups on D1, D8, D15, D21.

resultsAll subjects had a significant improvement in all the parameters on D21 relative to D1 (p < .05), except for pain at rest (p = .065 for CC and p = .052 for SC). On D21, the CC group had a significantly larger improvement in the joint effusion (p = .002), pain during activity (p = .005), 6MWT (p = .018) and KOOS (p = .004) than the SC group. Based on the survival analysis, the CC group had significantly faster improvement in the joint ROM (p = .011 for flexion and p = .038 for extension) and knee circumference (p = .013) than the SC group.

conclusionsBoth cryotherapy methods improved joint ROM, trophic changes, pain and function. Adding dynamic compression to a cryotherapy protocol provided further benefits: a significantly faster improvement in passive knee flexion ROM, a greater reduction of swelling, and pain during activity. Similarly, walking distance and KOOS questionnaire were significantly better for CC. TRIALS REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database on 14/09/2023 (identifier: NCT06037824).

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeAgedCryotherapyEdemaHumansKnee JointPostoperative PainRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeCryotherapy, range of motionFunctionPainPostoperative rehabilitationSwellingTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID38419032
PMCPMC10900683
OpenAlexW4392236901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.