Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38419000›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2024

The role of sociodemographic, psychosocial, and behavioral factors in the use of preventive healthcare services in children and adolescents: results of the KiGGS Wave 2 study.

Philip Bammert, Wiebke Schüttig, Iryna Iashchenko, Jacob Spallek, Petra Rattay, Sven Schneider, Matthias Richter, Claudia R Pischke, Nico Dragano, Leonie Sundmacher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Philip BammertChair of Health Economics, Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. philip.bammert@tum.de.
Wiebke SchüttigChair of Health Economics, Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Iryna IashchenkoChair of Health Economics, Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jacob SpallekDepartment of Public Health, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.
Petra RattayDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Sven SchneiderCenter for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health (CPD), Division of General Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Matthias RichterDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Claudia R PischkeInstitute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, University of Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Nico DraganoInstitute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, University of Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Leonie SundmacherChair of Health Economics, Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEBrandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEHeidelberg University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DERobert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany, various preventive services are offered to children and adolescents. These include regular standardized examinations (so called U/J examinations) and several vaccinations. Although strongly recommended, most of them are not mandatory. Our aim is to identify factors associated with the use of U/J examinations and vaccination against diphtheria, hepatitis B, Hib, pertussis, polio, and tetanus. While previous research has focused on sociodemographic factors, we also include socioeconomic, behavioral, and psychosocial factors.

methodsWe analyzed cross-sectional data from 15,023 participants (aged 0-17 years) of the nationwide representative KiGGS Wave 2 Survey. Participation in U/J examinations was assessed using a questionnaire, filled out by participants and/or their parents. Information on vaccination status was drawn from the participants' vaccination booklets. To identify relevant determinants for the use of preventive examinations and vaccinations, unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were employed with up to 16 different independent variables.

resultsVarious independent variables showed an association with the use of preventive services. Higher socioeconomic status, absence of migration background, and lower household size were associated with significantly higher utilization of U examinations. Parents' marital status, area of residence, behavioral and psychosocial factors yielded insignificant results for most U/J examinations. Higher vaccination rates were found for children with no migration background, with residence in eastern Germany, lower household size, and with married parents.

conclusionThis study attempted to depict the influence of sociodemographic, psychosocial, and behavioral factors on the use of several preventive services. Our results indicate that predominantly sociodemographic variables influence the use of preventive services. Further efforts should be made to investigate the interplay of different determinants of healthcare use in children and adolescents.

Indexed as

Preventive Health ServicesVaccinationAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesHealthcare useInequityPediatricsPreventionVaccination

Identifiers

PMID38419000
PMCPMC10900680
OpenAlexW4392233275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.