ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
An uncertainty-based interpretable deep learning framework for predicting breast cancer outcome.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-based single-sample molecular classifier for cancer grading.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPredicting outcome of breast cancer is important for selecting appropriate treatments and prolonging the survival periods of patients. Recently, different deep learning-based methods have been carefully designed for cancer outcome prediction. However, the application of these methods is still challenged by interpretability. In this study, we proposed a novel multitask deep neural network called UISNet to predict the outcome of breast cancer. The UISNet is able to interpret the importance of features for the prediction model via an uncertainty-based integrated gradients algorithm. UISNet improved the prediction by introducing prior biological pathway knowledge and utilizing patient heterogeneity information.
resultsThe model was tested in seven public datasets of breast cancer, and showed better performance (average C-index = 0.691) than the state-of-the-art methods (average C-index = 0.650, ranged from 0.619 to 0.677). Importantly, the UISNet identified 20 genes as associated with breast cancer, among which 11 have been proven to be associated with breast cancer by previous studies, and others are novel findings of this study.
conclusionsOur proposed method is accurate and robust in predicting breast cancer outcomes, and it is an effective way to identify breast cancer-associated genes. The method codes are available at: https://github.com/chh171/UISNet .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.