Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38418931›Full record

ReviewJournal of environmental quality

A review of the development and implementation of the critical source area concept: A reflection of Andrew Sharpley's role in improving water quality.

Richard McDowell, Peter J A Kleinman, Philip Haygarth, Joshua M McGrath, Douglas Smith, Louise Heathwaite, Antti Iho, Oscar Schoumans, David Nash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Richard McDowellAgResearch, Lincoln Science Centre, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3911-4825
Peter J A KleinmanUSDA ARS, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5093-3736
Philip HaygarthLancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1672-6290
Joshua M McGrathOCP North America, Wayzata, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1212-8795
Douglas SmithUSDA Agricultural Research Service, Temple, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7194-5787
Louise HeathwaiteLancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Antti IhoLUKE, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
Oscar SchoumansWageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
David NashUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4723-7780

Funding

Our Land and Water National Science Challenge (New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment C10X1507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical source areas (CSAs) are small areas of a field, farm, or catchment that account for most contaminant loss by having both a high contaminant availability and transport potential. Most work on CSAs has focused on phosphorus (P), largely through the work in the 1990s initiated by Dr. Sharpley and colleagues who recognized the value in targeting mitigation efforts. The CSA concept has been readily grasped by scientists, farmers, and policymakers across the globe. However, experiences and success have been mixed, often caused by the variation in where and how CSAs are defined. For instance, analysis of studies from 1990 to 2023 shows that the proportion of the annual contaminant load coming from a CSA decreases from field to farm to catchment scale. This finding is consistent with increased buffering of CSAs and greater contribution of other sources with scale, or variation in the definition of CSAs. We therefore argue that the best application of CSAs to target mitigation actions should be at small areas that truly account for most contaminant loss. This article sheds light on the development and utilization of CSAs, paying tribute to Dr. Sharpley's remarkable contributions to the improvement of water quality, and reflecting upon where the CSA concept has succeeded or not in reducing contaminant (largely P) loss.

Indexed as

Water Pollutants, ChemicalWater QualityAgricultureEnvironmental MonitoringPhosphorusPhosphorusWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID38418931
PMCPMC12265873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.