Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38418761›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2024

Comparing perioperative outcomes between regional anesthesia and general anesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Song Liu, Jianan Chen, Huihong Shi, Jianhong Li, Gang Zeng, Wenzhou Liu, Wenjun Hu, Shaoguang Li, Wenjie Gao, Weidong Song and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Song Liu *Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianan Chen *Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Huihong Shi *Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianhong LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Gang ZengDepartment of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenzhou LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenjun HuDepartment of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shaoguang LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenjie GaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Weidong SongDepartment of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Anjing LiangDepartment of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanbo ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Yingfeng Road, 33th Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510000, China. sysuchenybo3@163.com.
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

Medical Research Foundation of Guangdong Province A2021280Sun Yat-sen Clinical Research Cultivation Program SYS-Q-202105Sun Yat-sen Scientific Research Project YXQH202213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNearly all patients with hip fractures undergo surgical treatment. The use of different anesthesia techniques during surgery may influence the clinical outcomes. The optimal anesthetic technique for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery is still controversial. We performed this updated systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery with different anesthesia techniques. SOURCE: Articles published from 2000 to May 2023 were included from MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing general anesthesia (GA) with regional anesthesia (RA) for the outcomes of 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, length of hospital stay, and length of surgery in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Subgroup analyses were performed for the outcomes based on study design (randomized controlled trials or observational studies). We used a random-effects model for all analyses. PRINCIPAL

findingsIn this meta-analysis, we included 12 randomized controlled trials. There was no difference in postoperative 30-day mortality between the two groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 1.74; I

conclusionIn this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, RA did not reduce postoperative 30-day mortality in hip fracture surgery patients compared to GA. Fewer patients receiving RA had intraoperative hypotension than those receiving GA did. Apart from intraoperative hypotension, the data showed no differences in complications between the two anesthetic techniques. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023411854); registered 7 April 2023.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesia, GeneralHip FracturesHospital MortalityLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHumansgeneral anesthesiahip fracture surgerymeta-analysisregional anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID38418761
OpenAlexW4392229722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.