Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38418691›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2024

Fused Deposition Modeling 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications: A Review.

Pawan Kumar, Shamim, Mohammad Muztaba, Tarmeen Ali, Jyoti Bala, Haramritpal Singh Sidhu, Amit Bhatia

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. ESOT Roadmap for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Transplantation: Navigating Regulatory Challenges to Enhance Access and Care.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pawan KumarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, Maharaja Ranjit Singh Punjab Technical University, Bathinda, 151001, India. pawankamiya@yahoo.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6549-9779
ShamimIIMT College of Medical Sciences, IIMT University, Ganga Nagar, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, 250001, India.
Mohammad MuztabaDepartment of Pharmacology, Praduman Singh Sikshan Prasikshan Sansthan Pharmacy College, Phutahiya Sansarpur, Basti, Uttar Pradesh, 272001, India.
Tarmeen AliDepartment of Pharmacy, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Subhartipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, 250005, India.
Jyoti BalaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, Maharaja Ranjit Singh Punjab Technical University, Bathinda, 151001, India.
Haramritpal Singh SidhuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Giani Zail Singh Campus College of Engineering & Technology, Maharaja Ranjit Singh Punjab Technical University, Bathinda, 151001, India.
Amit BhatiaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, Maharaja Ranjit Singh Punjab Technical University, Bathinda, 151001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of bone tissue engineering as a trend in regenerative medicine is forcing scientists to create highly functional materials and scaffold construction techniques. Bone tissue engineering uses 3D bio-printed scaffolds that allow and stimulate the attachment and proliferation of osteoinductive cells on their surfaces. Bone grafting is necessary to expedite the patient's condition because the natural healing process of bones is slow. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is therefore suggested as a technique for the production process due to its simplicity, ability to create intricate components and movable forms, and low running costs. 3D-printed scaffolds can repair bone defects in vivo and in vitro. For 3D printing, various materials including metals, polymers, and ceramics are often employed but polymeric biofilaments are promising candidates for replacing non-biodegradable materials due to their adaptability and environment friendliness. This review paper majorly focuses on the fused deposition modeling approach for the fabrication of 3D scaffolds. In addition, it also provides information on biofilaments used in FDM 3D printing, applications, and commercial aspects of scaffolds in bone tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBone and BonesHumansPolymersPrinting, Three-DimensionalPolymers3D printingBiofilamentsBone tissue engineeringPolymersScaffolds

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.