Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38418666›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024

Menstrual Blood Donation for Endometriosis Research: A Cross-Sectional Survey on Women's Willingness and Potential Barriers.

Kheira Bouzid, Mathilde Bourdon, Roxane Bartkowski, Marie Verbanck, Charles Chapron, Louis Marcellin, Frederic Batteux, Pietro Santulli, Ludivine Doridot

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kheira BouzidUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, Inserm, CNRS, 75014, Paris, France.
Mathilde BourdonUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, Inserm, CNRS, 75014, Paris, France.
Roxane BartkowskiUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, Inserm, CNRS, 75014, Paris, France.
Marie VerbanckUR 7537 - BioSTM Biostatistique, Traitement et Modélisation des données Biologiques, Faculté de Pharmacie de Paris, Université Paris Cité, F-75270, Paris, France.
Charles ChapronUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, Inserm, CNRS, 75014, Paris, France.
Louis MarcellinUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, Inserm, CNRS, 75014, Paris, France.
Frederic BatteuxUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, Inserm, CNRS, 75014, Paris, France.
Pietro SantulliUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, Inserm, CNRS, 75014, Paris, France.
Ludivine DoridotUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, Inserm, CNRS, 75014, Paris, France. ludivine.doridot@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-4380-1118
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 101078556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An anonymous online survey in French was used to assess if endometriosis patients would be as ready as unaffected women to donate their menstrual blood for biological research on endometriosis and evaluate potential barriers to such donation. It was distributed in September 2022 by social media and two mailing lists, including a French patient organization. The questionnaire assessed participant age and brief medical history (hormonal contraception, endometriosis diagnosis, type of endometriosis), menstrual experience (menstrual blood abundance, dysmenorrhea), and whether participants would donate menstrual blood. Women who self-declared with an established endometriosis diagnosis versus no endometriosis were compared. Seven hundred seventy-eight women answered the survey. Among women with menstruation (n = 568), 78% are willing to donate menstrual blood for research. Importantly, this proportion was higher in women who declared having an established endometriosis diagnosis (83%, n = 299) compared to self-declared unaffected women (68%, n = 134, p < 0.001). The previous use of a menstrual cup and dysmenorrhea were significantly associated with the willingness to donate menstrual blood, while the use of hormonal contraception was significantly associated with an unwillingness to donate. Only the previous use of the menstrual cup had a predictive value for menstrual blood donation. No significant relationship was observed between menstrual blood donation and age, heavy menstrual bleeding and in endometriosis patients, endometriosis subtypes. In conclusion, women affected or not by endometriosis are largely willing to donate their menstrual blood for research on endometriosis, dysmenorrhea is not a barrier for donation, and women who use a menstrual cup are the more likely to donate.

Indexed as

EndometriosisMenstruationAdultBiomedical ResearchBlood DonationBlood DonorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBiological researchEndometriosisMenstrual bloodOnline survey

Identifiers

PMID38418666
PMCPMC11111534
OpenAlexW4392230480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.