Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38418634›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2024

Round ligament management during minimally invasive groin hernia repair in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

C A B Silveira, S Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo, A C D Rasador, M G Fernandez, R R H Martin, Y J M Dias, R Lu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

C A B SilveiraBahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Rua Dom João VI, 275, Salvador, BA, 40290-000, Brazil. carlossilveira18.1@bahiana.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0002-2428-0620
S Mazzola Poli de FigueiredoCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
A C D RasadorBahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Rua Dom João VI, 275, Salvador, BA, 40290-000, Brazil.
M G FernandezBahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Rua Dom João VI, 275, Salvador, BA, 40290-000, Brazil.
R R H MartinBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Y J M DiasWashington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
R LuUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · BRBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemale sex has been associated with worse outcomes after groin hernia repair (GHR), including a higher rate of chronic pain and recurrence. Most of the studies in GHR are performed in males, and the recommendations for females extrapolate from these studies, even though females have anatomy intricacies. The round ligament of the uterus (RLU) is associated with pelvic stabilization and plays a role in sensory function. Transection of the RLU during GHR is controversial as it can allow easier mesh placement but can favor genitourinary complications and chronic pain. As no previous meta-analysis compared preserving versus transecting the RLU during minimally invasive (MIS) GHR, we aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating surgical outcomes comparing the approaches.

methodsCochrane Central, Embase, and PubMed databases were systematically searched for studies comparing transection versus preservation of the RLU in MIS groin hernia surgeries. Outcomes assessed were operative time, bleeding, surgical site events, hospital stay, chronic pain, paresthesia, recurrence rates, and genital prolapse rates. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1. Heterogeneity was assessed with I

results1738 studies were screened. A total of six studies, comprising 1131 women, were included, of whom 652 (57.6%) had preservation of the RLU during MIS groin hernia repair. We found no statistical difference regarding chronic pain, paresthesia, recurrence rates, and postoperative complications. We found a longer operative time for the preservation group (MD 6.84 min; 95% CI 3.0-10.68; P = 0.0005; I

conclusionTransecting the RLU reduces the operative time during MIS GHR with no difference regarding postoperative complication rates. Although transection appears safe, further prospective randomized studies with long-term follow-up and patient-reported outcomes are necessary to define the optimal management of RLU during MIS GHR.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRound LigamentsFemoral herniaHerniaInguinal herniaRound ligament of uterus

Identifiers

PMID38418634
OpenAlexW4392229903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.