GuidelineEuropean radiology2024
ESR Essentials: Imaging in colorectal cancer-practice recommendations by ESGAR.
Guideline in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Signaling Pathways, Clinical Features, Screening, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- Review
- Exploring the diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for colorectal cancer assessment: feasibility of artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Preoperative CT Evaluation of Abdominal Vasculature and the Risk of Surgical Complications in Colorectal Cancer Resection with Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Macro Habitat-Based T2-Weighted MRI Radiomics and Deep Learning Fusion for Predicting Treatment Response and Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- A deep learning-based automated pipeline for colorectal cancer detection in contrast-enhanced CT images.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Preoperative Peritoneal MRI: Usefulness to Highlight Potential Hidden Lesions for Complete Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients with Colorectal Cancer with Surgical History.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven body composition analysis and its association with survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2026Article
- Comparative accuracy of spectral computed tomography and conventional computed tomography in colorectal cancer staging.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The impact of FAPI PET on staging and management in patients with digestive system tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Case Report: Ultrasound features of pathological complete response in middle and low rectal cancer with high microsatellite instability after neoadjuvant immunotherapy: a case series.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Design and Preclinical Evaluation of aACS omega · 2025Article
- CT-Based Radiomics Models with External Validation for Prediction of Recurrence and Disease-Specific Mortality After Radical Surgery of Colorectal Liver Metastases.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Prediction of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Using Two Internally Validated Radiomic Models.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Photoacoustic-Integrated Multimodal Approach for Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
- [Role of radiology for primary staging of colorectal cancer].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Article
- A new paradigm in postoperative colorectal cancer surveillance: integrating advanced imaging and multi-omics.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Long non‑coding RNAs as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health concern. Diagnostic imaging, using different modalities, has a pivotal role in CRC, from early detection (i.e., screening) to follow-up. The role of imaging in CRC screening depends on each country's approach: if an organized screening program is in place, the role of CT colonography (CTC) is limited to the study of either individuals with a positive stool test unwilling/unable to undergo colonoscopy (CC) or in patients with incomplete CC. Although CC is the most common modality to diagnose CRC, CRC can be also incidentally detected during a routine abdominal imaging examination or at the emergency room in patients presenting with intestinal occlusion/subocclusion or perforation. Staging is a crucial aspect of CRC management, guiding treatment decisions and providing valuable prognostic information. An accurate local staging is mandatory in both rectal and colon cancer to drive the appropriate therapeutic workflow. Important limitations of US, CT, and MR in N-staging can be partially solved by FDG PET/CT. Distant staging is usually managed by CT, with MR and FDG PET/CT which can be used as problem-solving techniques. Follow-up is performed according to the general recommendations of the oncological societies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: It is essential to summarize each phase of colorectal cancer workup, differentiating the management for colon and rectal cancer supported by the main international guidelines and literature data, with the aim to inform the community on the best practice imaging in colorectal cancer. KEY POINTS: • Colorectal cancer is a prevalent disease that lends itself to imaging at each stage of detection and management. • Various imaging modalities can be used as adjuncts to, or in place of, direct visualization methods of screening and are necessary for evaluating metastatic disease. • Reevaluation of follow-up strategies should be considered depending on patients' individual risk of recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.