Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38418626›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Competence of radiologists in cardiac CT and MR imaging in Europe: insights from the ESCR Registry.

Federica Catapano, Lukas Jakob Moser, Marco Francone, Carlo Catalano, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Ricardo P J Budde, Rodrigo Salgado, Maja Hrabak Paar, Maja Pirnat, Christian Loewe and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 16 institutions in 9 countries.

Federica Catapano *Department of Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Lukas Jakob Moser *Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marco FranconeDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Carlo CatalanoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Rozemarijn VliegenthartDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ricardo P J BuddeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rodrigo SalgadoDepartment of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital & Antwerp University, Holy Heart Lier, Lier, Belgium.
Maja Hrabak PaarDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Maja PirnatRadiology Department, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Christian LoeweDivision of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Konstantin NikolaouDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Michelle C WilliamsBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Giuseppe MuscogiuriDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, San Luca Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Luigi NataleDepartment of Radiological Sciences - Institute of Radiology, Catholic University of Rome, A. Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Lukas LehmkuhlClinic for Radiology, Heart Center Bad Neustadt a.d. Saale, Bad Neustadt a.d. Saale, Germany.
Malte Maria SierenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Lübeck, Germany.
Matthias GutberletDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig - Heart Centre, Leipzig, Germany.
Hatem AlkadhiDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland. hatem.alkadhi@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2581-2166
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITUniversity of Zurich · CHAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAntwerp University Hospital · BEBritish Heart Foundation · GBErasmus MC · NLIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITLeipzig Heart Institute · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATPoliclinico Umberto I · ITRhön-Klinikum · DEUniversity Clinical Centre Maribor · SIUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleTo provide an overview of the current status of cardiac multimodality imaging practices in Europe and radiologist involvement using data from the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) MRCT-registry. MATERIALS AND

methodsNumbers on cardiac CT and MRI examinations were extracted from the MRCT-registry of the ESCR, entered between January 2011 and October 2023 (n = 432,265). Data collection included the total/annual numbers of examinations, indications, complications, and reporting habits.

resultsThirty-two countries contributed to the MRCT-registry, including 29 European countries. Between 2011 and 2022, there was a 4.5-fold increase in annually submitted CT examinations, from 3368 to 15,267, and a 3.8-fold increase in MRI examinations, from 3445 to 13,183. The main indications for cardiac CT were suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) (59%) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning (21%). The number of patients with intermediate pretest probability who underwent CT for suspected CAD showed an increase from 61% in 2012 to 82% in 2022. The main MRI indications were suspected myocarditis (26%), CAD (21%), and suspected cardiomyopathy (19%). Adverse event rates were very low for CT (0.3%) and MRI (0.7%) examinations. Reporting of CT and MRI examinations was performed mainly by radiologists (respectively 76% and 71%) and, to a lesser degree, in consensus with non-radiologists (19% and 27%, respectively). The remaining examinations (4.9% CT and 1.7% MRI) were reported by non-radiological specialties or in separate readings of radiologists and non-radiologists.

conclusionsReal-life data on cardiac imaging in Europe using the largest available MRCT-registry demonstrate a considerable increase in examinations over the past years, the vast majority of which are read by radiologists. These findings indicate that radiologists contribute to meeting the increasing demands of competent and effective care in cardiac imaging to a relevant extent. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The number of cardiac CT and MRI examinations has risen over the past years, and radiologists read the vast majority of these studies as recorded in the MRCT-registry. KEY POINTS: • The number of cardiac imaging examinations is constantly increasing. • Radiologists play a central role in providing cardiac CT and MR imaging services to a large volume of patients. • Cardiac CT and MR imaging examinations performed and read by radiologists show a good safety profile.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiologistsRegistriesTomography, X-Ray ComputedEuropeHeart DiseasesHumansMaleCardiac diseasesCardiac imaging techniquesCT angiographyMagnetic resonance imagingRegistry data

Identifiers

PMID38418626
PMCPMC11364788
OpenAlexW4392242258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.