ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Competence of radiologists in cardiac CT and MR imaging in Europe: insights from the ESCR Registry.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational vs standard coronary angiography: meta-analysis.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2026Pooled it
- Endothelial Dysfunction and Obesity: New Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Reduction of radiation exposure and preserved image quality using photon-counting detector cardiac computed tomography without electrocardiographic gating in children with congenital heart disease.European radiology · 2026Article
- Mitral Annular Disjunction Assessed Using Cardiac MR Imaging in Pediatric Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An Innovative Application of High-Fidelity Medical Simulators to Objectively Demonstrate the Impact of Sports on the Development of Fine Motor Skills-A Pilot Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging practices: insights from the MRCT registry.European radiology · 2025Article
- Trends in Clinical Cardiac Photon-Counting Detector CT Research: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Current trends and challenges in the clinical use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a survey from the Italian Society of Cardiology.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Barriers to cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging scan performance and reporting by cardiologists: a systematic literature review.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Management of acute chest pain in the Emergency Department: benefits of coronary computed tomography angiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Review
- Prognostic value of stress CMR and SPECT-MPI in patients undergoing intermediate-to-high-risk non-cardiac surgery.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Clinically Relevant Extracardiac Findings at Cardiac Imaging: Insights from the European MR/CT Registry.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 16 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleTo provide an overview of the current status of cardiac multimodality imaging practices in Europe and radiologist involvement using data from the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) MRCT-registry. MATERIALS AND
methodsNumbers on cardiac CT and MRI examinations were extracted from the MRCT-registry of the ESCR, entered between January 2011 and October 2023 (n = 432,265). Data collection included the total/annual numbers of examinations, indications, complications, and reporting habits.
resultsThirty-two countries contributed to the MRCT-registry, including 29 European countries. Between 2011 and 2022, there was a 4.5-fold increase in annually submitted CT examinations, from 3368 to 15,267, and a 3.8-fold increase in MRI examinations, from 3445 to 13,183. The main indications for cardiac CT were suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) (59%) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning (21%). The number of patients with intermediate pretest probability who underwent CT for suspected CAD showed an increase from 61% in 2012 to 82% in 2022. The main MRI indications were suspected myocarditis (26%), CAD (21%), and suspected cardiomyopathy (19%). Adverse event rates were very low for CT (0.3%) and MRI (0.7%) examinations. Reporting of CT and MRI examinations was performed mainly by radiologists (respectively 76% and 71%) and, to a lesser degree, in consensus with non-radiologists (19% and 27%, respectively). The remaining examinations (4.9% CT and 1.7% MRI) were reported by non-radiological specialties or in separate readings of radiologists and non-radiologists.
conclusionsReal-life data on cardiac imaging in Europe using the largest available MRCT-registry demonstrate a considerable increase in examinations over the past years, the vast majority of which are read by radiologists. These findings indicate that radiologists contribute to meeting the increasing demands of competent and effective care in cardiac imaging to a relevant extent. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The number of cardiac CT and MRI examinations has risen over the past years, and radiologists read the vast majority of these studies as recorded in the MRCT-registry. KEY POINTS: • The number of cardiac imaging examinations is constantly increasing. • Radiologists play a central role in providing cardiac CT and MR imaging services to a large volume of patients. • Cardiac CT and MR imaging examinations performed and read by radiologists show a good safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.