ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2024
[Cardiogenetics in Germany- a view and review].
Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of the cardiogenetics field in Germany has been increasing since the mid-1990s with many national contributions, some of them were really important and groundbreaking. The starting point was and still is the patient and his family, e.g. with a familial form of arrhythmia or cardiomyopathy, the clarification of the genetic cause and the personalized treatment of those being affected. The scientific, always translationally oriented interest in identifying a causative gene and uncovering the underlying pathomechanisms has led to notable contributions for Brugada syndrome, short QT syndrome and cardiac conduction disorders or sinus node dysfunction, but also in DCM or ARVC. What is important, however, is always the way back (bench > bed side): implementation of national and international recommendations for cardiogenetic diagnostics in daily cardiological routine and the personalized care and therapy of those being affected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.