Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38418171›Full record

ArticleZhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi2024

[Expert consensus on the treatment of second-degree burn wounds (2024 edition) Ⅱ: surgical treatment and infection prevention and treatment].

Chinese Burn Association, Tissue Repair of Burns and Trauma Committee, Cross-Straits Medicine Exchange Association of China

Abstract readEnglish AbstractConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chinese Burn Association, Tissue Repair of Burns and Trauma Committee
Cross-Straits Medicine Exchange Association of China

Funding

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2019-I2M-5-076Deep Blue Talent Project of Naval Medical UniversityGeneral Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 81971836Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 81930057Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader 23XD1425000Shanghai Top Priority Research Center Project 2023ZZ02013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Second-degree burns are the most common type of burns in clinical practice and hard to manage. The treatment needs not only to consider the possible different effects of dressing change or surgical treatment itself, but also requires the evaluation of many factors such as burn site, ages of patients, and burn area. At present, there are no unified standards or specifications for the surgical procedures of wound treatment, as well as infection diagnosis and grading of second-degree burn wounds, which seriously affects the formulation of clinical treatment plans. The consensus writing group developed the

Indexed as

BurnsSoft Tissue InjuriesConsensusHumansSkin TransplantationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38418171
PMCPMC11630156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.